2015 Peugeot 208 1.2L Petrol · AF15 ADX

The 2015 Peugeot 208’s most recent MOT test on 2026-03-20 confirms it remains roadworthy, though the immediate preceding test on 2026-03-19—conducted at the same mileage—failed without recorded defects. This suggests an administrative or procedural oversight rather than a mechanical issue, as no faults were logged in either the 2025 or 2024 tests. The vehicle’s history shows a consistent pattern of passing without advisories, indicating no recurring structural or safety-critical failures. However, the lack of defects does not preclude hidden wear, particularly in high-mileage components like suspension bushes, coil springs, or brake calipers, which are not always captured in a standard MOT. The recorded mileage of 98,022 miles at the latest test aligns with an average of approximately 8,900 miles per year over its lifespan, which is typical for a vehicle of this age. There are no significant gaps or spikes in mileage between tests, as the intervals between 2024 and 2026 remain steady at around 12,000 miles per year. This suggests the vehicle has been used regularly without prolonged periods of neglect or excessive wear from aggressive driving. That said, the absence of advisories in prior tests means potential issues like minor corrosion or worn suspension components may not have been flagged. Given the lack of recorded defects, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of the suspension system, particularly the rear bushes and coil springs, which are prone to fatigue at this mileage. The brakes, including calipers, pads, and discs, should be checked for uneven wear or binding, especially since the MOT tester did not note any brake-related issues. Structural integrity—such as underbody corrosion around the sills, wheel arches, and exhaust system—should also be examined, as these are common failure points in vehicles of this age and mileage. The engine bay and drivetrain components, while not typically MOT-critical, warrant attention for leaks or unusual wear. The recent failed test without defects is unusual, so verifying the vehicle’s service history for non-MOT-maintained items like timing belts or fluid changes would provide further reassurance.