2012 Ford Grand C-MAX 2.0L Diesel · AF62 LBK

The most recent MOT test for the 2012 Ford Grand C-Max occurred on 2024-12-09, where it passed with several advisories present. While this is a positive outcome, the vehicle’s MOT history reveals a pattern of recurring issues rather than a clear improvement. The 2024 test follows a failed MOT in late 2023, which highlighted critical failures in both service and parking brake efficiency, indicating a persistent problem with brake system reliability. Prior to that, the 2020 test also failed due to brake-related concerns, alongside a headlamp levelling device failure, suggesting that while the vehicle has passed recent MOTs, underlying wear and potential long-term degradation in key components like brake actuators, calipers, or hydraulic lines cannot be entirely ruled out. The advisories on brake disc wear—front and rear—are consistent across multiple tests, indicating gradual deterioration that should be monitored closely, particularly if the vehicle is driven regularly. The recorded mileage of 79,850 miles for a vehicle aged 14 years represents an unusually low annual usage rate of approximately 5,704 miles per year, which is significantly below the average for its age. Such low mileage often correlates with prolonged periods of inactivity, during which certain components—particularly those prone to corrosion or fluid degradation—may suffer more than they would under normal driving conditions. For example, standing brakes can corrode the discs and calipers, leading to binding or reduced efficiency, while fluids like brake fluid and differential oil can degrade over time due to evaporation or contamination. Additionally, suspension components, which are frequently subject to wear from dynamic loading, may accelerate deterioration when a vehicle sits idle for extended periods, as lubricants can dry out and joints can stiffen. The combination of low mileage and a history of brake-related advisories suggests that the vehicle may have been used sparingly, potentially exacerbating issues like corrosion or fluid degradation that were not fully addressed during previous servicing. Given the recurring advisories on suspension arm bushings and brake discs, the prospective buyer should conduct a thorough inspection of the suspension system for signs of excessive play or binding, particularly in the trailing arms and lower control arms. On a test drive, listen for unusual clunks or rattles from the suspension, especially when driving over bumps or at speed, as these may indicate worn or failing bushings or broken suspension links. Inspect the brake system for any signs of uneven wear on the discs, which could suggest binding calipers or hydraulic issues. Check for a firm, even application of the brakes without any sponginess or pulling to one side, as this may indicate a failing master cylinder or brake line issue. Additionally, visually inspect the brake discs for pitting or scoring, and measure their thickness to ensure they remain above the legal minimum—typically around 1.5mm for most vehicles—before considering replacement. For the buyer, given the vehicle’s age and low mileage, a comprehensive physical inspection is essential to address potential long-term issues. Start with the brakes, checking for corrosion on the discs and calipers, particularly if the vehicle has been stored for prolonged periods, as this can lead to binding and reduced braking performance. Inspect the brake fluid level and condition, as old fluid can become contaminated and degrade brake efficiency. The suspension should be checked for signs of rust or corrosion in the mounting points, especially if the vehicle has been left stationary for extended periods. Verify that all fluid levels—brake, differential, coolant, and power steering—are correct and that fluids are within their recommended service dates, as fluids degrade over time regardless of mileage. Finally, examine the tyres for signs of sidewall cracking or perishing, which can occur even at low mileage due to age-related degradation, and ensure they meet the legal minimum tread depth of 1.6mm. If the vehicle has a service history, confirm that all scheduled maintenance—such as timing belt replacement, if applicable, and fluid servicing—has been recorded, as this will provide reassurance about the vehicle’s long-term reliability.