2017 KIA Ceed 1.6L Diesel · AF67 AGV

The 2017 KIA Ceed has demonstrated a stable roadworthiness record over the past three MOT cycles, with no defects or advisories recorded in any of the five tests conducted between February 2023 and November 2025. The most recent inspection on 17 November 2025—just six months prior to today—confirmed the vehicle passed without fail, suggesting consistent compliance with UK roadworthiness standards. While the absence of faults is reassuring, the duplicate entry for January 2025 (both a pass and a fail at the same mileage) appears anomalous and may indicate a clerical error rather than mechanical issues. No recurring advisories or structural concerns have been flagged, implying the vehicle has likely undergone regular servicing or been maintained by owners attentive to minor wear before it escalated. The mileage progression of 85,582 miles over nine years reflects an average annual distance of approximately 9,509 miles, which is typical for a vehicle of this age. There are no significant gaps in testing—each MOT was conducted within the standard 12-month window, with the longest interval between tests spanning 11 months (from January 2024 to February 2025). The absence of rapid mileage spikes or prolonged periods of inactivity suggests the vehicle has been used consistently rather than left unused or stored for extended periods. However, the lack of service records beyond MOTs means critical maintenance intervals (e.g., timing belt replacement, suspension servicing, or fluid changes) cannot be verified from this data alone. Given the clean MOT history, a prospective buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of high-wear components that are not routinely tested under MOT standards. Focus on the suspension system—particularly the condition of coil springs, bushes, and dampers—for signs of uneven wear or corrosion, as these are critical for handling and safety. The braking system warrants close examination, including brake discs for thickness and uniformity, caliper binding, and master cylinder fluid condition, even though no braking faults were recorded. Structural integrity should also be assessed, especially around wheel arches, sills, and subframes, for corrosion or damage that could compromise the chassis. Finally, verify the integrity of the exhaust system, catalytic converter, and emissions-related components, as these are often overlooked but can fail without prior warning. The lack of advisories in past tests does not guarantee these areas are flawless, so visual and functional checks are essential.