2013 Volvo S60 1.6L Diesel · AV63 FKP

The 2013 Volvo S60’s most recent MOT test on 2025-09-11 confirms it remains roadworthy, though the immediate preceding test on 2025-09-05—just six days earlier—was a failure without recorded defects. This anomaly suggests either a procedural error in the test centre or a vehicle that passed under unusually lenient conditions. The absence of advisories or repeated faults over the past five tests implies no systematic mechanical decline, but the double-testing in September 2025 warrants scrutiny of whether the vehicle was driven between tests or if the failure was a false negative. Structurally, the record offers no red flags, but the lack of advisories on critical components like suspension bushes or coil springs means those areas remain unconfirmed. The recorded mileage of 65,244 miles over 13 years—approximately 5,000 miles annually—sits well below the average for a vehicle of this age, suggesting either minimal use or prolonged periods of inactivity. The consistent annual mileage increments (e.g., 2,053 miles between 2022 and 2023, 1,949 between 2023 and 2024) indicate no sudden spikes or drops, which could have signalled aggressive driving or neglect. The gap between tests is standard, with each MOT occurring within days of the previous one’s failure, though the lack of defects in any test makes it impossible to determine whether the vehicle was driven between tests or if the failure was administrative. Given the clean MOT history, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of suspension components—particularly the rear bushes and coil springs—since no advisories were recorded to confirm their condition. The brakes, while not explicitly flagged, should be tested for binding calipers or uneven wear, as Volvo S60s are prone to rear brake drag over time. Corrosion, especially around the wheel arches, subframe, and exhaust system, should be examined, as the vehicle’s age increases the risk of structural compromise. Finally, the engine bay and underbody should be checked for leaks or fluid contamination, as these are often silent indicators of wear before they appear in an MOT. The absence of advisories does not guarantee these areas are sound.