2022 MG 5 Exclusive Electric · CF22 KWB

The defining mechanical concern surrounding this 2022 MG 5 Exclusive is a clear and accelerating deterioration of the front suspension, culminating in a dangerous failure at the 2026-07-07 test. The tester recorded both nearside and offside front suspension arm rear bushes as completely unbonded, classifying them as dangerous defects likely to result in detachment, alongside a major failure for a fractured offside rear coil spring. The vehicle was presented for retest just six days afterwards on 2026-07-13 and passed, but the advisories for perished rear tyres remained on the record. Looking back further, the 2025 test already flagged both front suspension arm pins or bushes as worn, demonstrating that what began as borderline wear only twelve months earlier had progressed to a dangerous state by mid-2026. This trajectory suggests the front suspension components were either approaching the end of their service life or had not been inspected or replaced proactively when the early advisories were first raised. Against a typical annual mileage of roughly 7,500 to 9,000 miles for a four-year-old vehicle, the recorded 61,454 miles equates to about 15,364 miles per year, placing this MG significantly above average. There are no extended gaps between recorded tests, which is consistent with continuous high-mileage use rather than long periods off the road. Mechanically, this elevated accumulation rate translates into substantially greater wear on suspension components, bushes, coil springs, brake pads and discs, tyres, and drivetrain parts than the odometer figure alone might suggest for a modern EV or hybrid platform of this age. The pattern of front bush wear followed by failure, along with a fractured rear coil spring, is consistent with the kind of accelerated component fatigue that high annual mileage typically produces, particularly on a vehicle frequently used over uneven urban or rural surfaces. For a prospective buyer, the immediate priority is establishing exactly what rectification work was carried out between the 2026-07-07 failure and the 2026-07-13 pass. Confirmation should be obtained that both front suspension arm bushes have been replaced with new components rather than merely refitted or repaired, and that the fractured offside rear coil spring was renewed along with its corresponding nearside spring as a matched pair, since a fractured spring often points to broader weakness on that axle. A physical inspection beneath the vehicle on a ramp or over a pit is strongly advisable to confirm the security of the new bushes, the condition of the surrounding lower arms and ball joints, and the absence of any play in the rear spring seats. During the road test, particular attention should be paid to any clonks, knocks, or shuddering through the front end over speed humps, potholes, and uneven surfaces, as well as any vagueness or wandering in the front end under braking or during lane changes, which could indicate that the new bushes have not cured deeper wear in the suspension geometry. The persistent tyre advisories for cracking and perishing on the tread of both rear tyres also warrant direct attention. Because these defects were flagged twice across the same test cycle, it is reasonable to question whether the tyres were actually replaced or merely retained, and a close visual check of the tread rubber for hairline cracking, sidewall crazing, and uneven shoulder wear is essential before purchase. Given the high recorded mileage, the brake discs and pads should be measured for remaining material, as wear here scales closely with annual mileage, and any scored lip on the front disc edges or pulsing under heavy braking would be a warning sign. Finally, request sight of the most recent service documentation to confirm that the suspension, brakes, and tyres have been addressed in a coherent manner; the jump from advisory wear in 2025 to dangerous failure in 2026 is a significant escalation that should be fully reconciled by documented repair history before any commitment is made.