2017 Renault Kadjar 1.2L Petrol · CH04 NTO

The Renault Kadjar’s most recent MOT test on 2026-04-01 confirms it remains roadworthy, though the record reveals a concerning pattern of repeated failures at the same mileage intervals. Both the 2024 and 2025 tests show identical failures at 37,280 and 47,805 miles respectively, despite subsequent retests passing—this suggests either a temporary fix or a recurring issue that was overlooked. The lack of defects in the 2026 test implies the vehicle may have been addressed post-failure, but the history raises questions about whether underlying problems were properly resolved or merely masked. Buyers should treat this as a cautionary signal, particularly if the failures involved critical components like brakes, suspension, or emissions. The mileage progression of 6,595 miles annually over nine years aligns with typical usage for this age, though the abrupt retest dates at identical mileages (2024-04-04 and 2025-03-28) indicate either a rushed repair cycle or a vehicle that was driven until it failed before being serviced. The gap between the 2025 failure and the 2026 pass—just over a year—suggests the owner may have prioritised passing the test over proactive maintenance. This pattern could imply deferred servicing or a lack of consistent upkeep, which may have allowed minor issues to escalate. Given the repeated failures, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of the braking system, particularly the rear calipers and discs, which are common failure points in Renault Kadjars. The suspension—especially the rear bushes and coil springs—should be checked for excessive wear or corrosion, as these components often correlate with binding brake issues. Exhaust emissions tests passing without fail suggest no obvious catalytic converter or lambda probe problems, but a visual check for rust around the exhaust manifold and underbody is essential. Structural integrity, particularly around the wheel arches and sills, should also be assessed for corrosion, as this model is prone to rust progression over time. The absence of advisories in any test is reassuring, but the repeated failures at identical mileages warrant scrutiny. If the vehicle was repaired between failures, evidence of quality work—such as fresh brake pads, suspension components, or corrosion treatment—would be expected. Buyers should verify whether the retests were genuine fixes or merely temporary solutions, and consider whether the vehicle’s history aligns with the claimed maintenance standards. A pre-purchase inspection by a qualified mechanic is strongly advised to confirm no hidden issues remain unresolved.