2010 Renault Scenic 1.6L Petrol · CK60 VRF

This Renault Scénic’s most recent MOT test on 30 December 2025—just six months prior to today—confirms it passed without any defects, though the preceding test on 29 December 2025 failed for an unexplained reason despite identical mileage (121,389 vs 121,838). The pattern over the past two years shows no recurring mechanical failures, and the absence of advisories or defects in the 2023 and 2024 tests suggests the vehicle has been maintained at a basic level, though not necessarily with proactive servicing. The lack of structural or safety-related warnings in any test implies no obvious signs of neglect, but the repeated failure just before the last pass raises caution—either a minor oversight in the final inspection or an intermittent issue that resolved itself. The mileage progression reveals a steady but not excessive usage pattern, averaging around 7,600 miles annually, which is typical for a vehicle of this age. The gap between the 2024 and 2025 tests spans 15 months, with no intermediate records, which could indicate either infrequent testing or a period of lower mileage. The jump from 109,307 to 121,838 miles between July 2024 and December 2025—roughly 12,500 miles in five months—suggests active use, though not aggressive. Without service records, it’s impossible to confirm whether major components like suspension bushes, coil springs, or drivetrain elements have been replaced, but the consistent pass/fail cycle without defects hints at a vehicle that has been driven rather than stored. Given the MOT history, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of the suspension geometry, particularly the rear bushes and coil springs, as these components often fail silently and can lead to handling issues or uneven tyre wear. The repeated failure just before the last pass warrants checking for intermittent faults in the braking system, such as binding calipers or worn brake pads that might have just cleared the threshold. Structural corrosion, especially around the wheel arches, sills, and subframe, should be examined closely, as this model is prone to rust in high-exposure areas. Finally, the exhaust system and emissions components—if the vehicle has undergone recent modifications—should be verified, as unapproved changes could explain the inconsistent test outcomes.