2013 Peugeot RCZ 1.6L Petrol · EO63 KXZ

The Peugeot RCZ’s most recent MOT test on 16 March 2026 confirms it remains roadworthy, with no defects recorded across the past three annual inspections. The absence of advisories or repeated failures suggests the vehicle has been maintained at a basic level, though the February 2024 retest—just 28 days before its scheduled expiry—implies a deliberate effort to avoid a lapse. The March 2023 to March 2024 gap shows no failures, but the 2024 retest’s timing hints at either a proactive owner or a minor oversight in scheduling. Overall, the trend is stable, with no evidence of worsening mechanical issues, though the lack of advisories also means critical components may not have been scrutinised beyond the MOT’s surface-level checks. The recorded mileage of 87,135 miles over approximately 13 years equates to an average of 6,703 miles annually, which is typical for a vehicle of this age. There are no significant gaps in the MOT history that would indicate prolonged non-use, nor are there abrupt spikes suggesting aggressive driving. The February 2024 retest, however, stands out as an unusual pre-expiry check—particularly given the vehicle’s low failure rate—though this could simply reflect a cautious owner rather than a mechanical concern. The consistency of mileage accumulation implies routine use without extreme wear patterns, though the lack of detailed service records means deeper mechanical conditions remain unverified. Given the MOT’s silence on advisories, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension—particularly the rear subframe and bushes—given the RCZ’s known susceptibility to wear in this area. The brakes, while not failed, should be checked for uneven pad thickness or binding calipers, especially if the vehicle has been driven hard. Corrosion is a critical concern for this model, so the underbody, wheel arches, and sills must be examined for rust penetration, particularly around the rear subframe and exhaust system. The exhaust emissions system, though not failed, may warrant closer inspection if the vehicle exhibits rough idling or hesitation, as catalytic converter efficiency can degrade silently. Finally, the tyres—if they remain in the record—should be assessed for uneven wear or tread depth, as failing twice on this criterion in prior models suggests basic upkeep may have been inconsistent.