2009 Renault Clio 1.1L Petrol · EY09 OVB

The 2009 Renault Clio has maintained a consistent MOT history with no defects recorded across four consecutive annual tests, most recently passing on 14 July 2025 at 103,956 miles. This suggests the vehicle has been subject to regular, if not rigorous, servicing and has avoided any major mechanical or structural failures during the test periods. The absence of advisories or failings in emissions, brakes, or suspension components implies the previous owner adhered to basic maintenance protocols, though this does not preclude hidden wear or deferred repairs outside the MOT scope. The most recent test was conducted just over a year ago, which is within the DVSA’s recommended interval for older vehicles, though a pre-purchase inspection remains critical given the car’s age. The recorded mileage of 103,956 miles over 17 years reflects an average of approximately 6,100 miles annually, a rate that aligns with typical light-to-moderate usage for a vehicle of this age. There are no significant gaps in mileage accumulation between tests, with increments of around 5,500 miles per year, suggesting the car has not been left unused for extended periods. This steady progression reduces concerns about prolonged neglect, though it also means higher wear on components like suspension bushes, coil springs, and brake calipers, which should be closely examined for fatigue or corrosion. Given the lack of MOT-reported issues, a buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of suspension integrity, particularly the rear bushes and coil springs, which are prone to deterioration in a vehicle of this age. The brakes, while not flagged in tests, should be assessed for uneven wear or binding calipers, especially if the car has experienced aggressive stopping patterns. Structural corrosion—common in Renault Clios—must be scrutinised at wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, as hidden rust can compromise structural integrity without immediate MOT failure. Tyre condition, despite no recorded tread issues, warrants verification, as the absence of advisories could indicate previous owners relied on minimal tread depth rather than proactive replacement. Finally, the exhaust system should be checked for leaks or excessive corrosion, particularly around joints and mounts, as this often goes unnoticed until it impacts emissions or structural stability.