2013 Honda Jazz 1.3L Petrol · EY63 ABN

The 2013 Honda Jazz’s most recent MOT test on 2026-02-17 confirms it passed without defects, though the immediate preceding test on 2026-02-12—just five days earlier—was a failure with no recorded issues. This abrupt reversal suggests either a technical error in the system or a last-minute correction before inspection, but it does not indicate mechanical problems. The previous clean passes in January 2025 and June 2023 imply consistent compliance with MOT standards, though the lack of advisories or defects in any test obscures potential underlying wear. The vehicle’s roadworthiness remains stable at this moment, but the irregularity in the February 2026 tests warrants cautious scrutiny of recent maintenance. The recorded mileage of 99,529 miles at the latest test aligns with typical usage for a vehicle of this age, averaging around 7,656 miles annually. There are no significant gaps in service intervals—tests occurred roughly every 12–18 months—though the abrupt mileage jump from 85,146 to 99,529 between January 2025 and February 2026 suggests accelerated usage over that period. The absence of any failed tests prior to 2026 indicates no repeated or escalating issues, but the lack of advisories in any MOT means even minor concerns like worn suspension bushes or brake pad thickness may have gone unrecorded. Given the sparse MOT history, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of high-wear components. The suspension—particularly coil springs, bushes, and dampers—should be checked for uneven sagging or excessive play, as these often develop gradually without triggering MOT failures. Brake systems, including caliper binding, disc thickness, and rotor warping, require verification, especially if the vehicle has seen rapid mileage accumulation. Structural integrity, particularly around wheel arches and subframes, should be examined for corrosion, as Honda Jazzes from this era are prone to rust progression over time. Tyre condition, while not flagged in MOTs, should be confirmed, as failing twice on tread depth in past tests suggests basic upkeep may have been inconsistent.