2010 Citroen C1 1.0L Petrol · FD10 SNU

The Citroën C1’s MOT history presents a striking anomaly: despite four consecutive tests within the last 18 months, the vehicle has failed twice—most recently on 1 April 2026 at 101,746 miles —yet with no recorded defects. This inconsistency raises immediate questions about the testing process or potential non-disclosure of faults. The absence of advisories or failures in prior passes suggests either meticulous maintenance or deliberate suppression of issues, though the repeated failures without explanation are highly unusual. A buyer should treat this as a red flag, as the DVSA’s failure to document even minor concerns—such as tyre condition, brake efficiency, or emissions—is atypical for a vehicle of this age and mileage. The mileage accumulation of 6,359 miles per year aligns with the average for a 16-year-old car, though the clustering of tests in March each year indicates the vehicle may have been driven primarily for annual compliance rather than regular use. The 9,000-mile jump between the 2024 and 2025 tests suggests a period of heavier use or delayed testing, while the 923-mile gap between the two 2025 failures implies the car was either off the road briefly or undergoing urgent repairs not reflected in the MOT record. The lack of mileage progression between the two 2025 tests— 92,819 to 92,962 miles —further implies possible test manipulation or an extended period of inactivity. Given the absence of documented faults, a buyer must conduct a thorough pre-purchase inspection, focusing on components typically prone to neglect or failure in this model. Priority should be given to the brake system , including pad thickness, disc condition, and caliper operation, as binding brakes are a common hidden issue in older Citröens. The suspension —particularly rubber bushes, coil springs, and ball joints—should be checked for wear or corrosion, especially if the car has spent time in damp conditions. Exhaust emissions may also warrant scrutiny, as the lack of recorded advisories could mask a failing catalytic converter or exhaust leak. Structural integrity, including sills, wheel arches, and underbody corrosion, should be examined closely, as rust in these areas often progresses undetected until it compromises safety. The clean MOT history, combined with the unexplained failures, suggests either exceptional maintenance or significant omissions. Without visible records of servicing or repairs, the vehicle’s true condition remains uncertain—a risk not justified by its age and mileage alone.