2007 Toyota Aygo 1.0L Petrol · FD57 AOL

Structural corrosion and recurring braking inconsistencies define the mechanical profile of this vehicle, culminating in a failure on 6 May 2024. While the record shows several clean passes in earlier years, the most recent evidence highlights major defects regarding imbalanced rear brakes and incorrect headlamp aim, alongside advisories for an overall corroded underside and a corroded nearside front Macpherson strut. This trajectory indicates a shift from a stable roadworthiness record toward increasing wear and environmental degradation of the chassis. The recorded mileage of 116,991 miles over nineteen years averages approximately 6,157 miles per annum, which is typical for a vehicle of this age. This level of usage suggests a steady accumulation of wear on drivetrain components, suspension linkages, and braking systems. The absence of an MOT record for 2020 suggests a period of reduced use or a gap in testing, which may correlate with the tyre perishing and brake binding issues noted in the surrounding years. A physical inspection should prioritise the underside and the nearside front Macpherson strut to determine the extent of the recorded corrosion and ensure the structural integrity of the chassis. During a test drive, pay close attention to the braking performance, specifically looking for any pedal judder or a feeling of imbalance during deceleration, which relates to the previous major failure and the history of binding rear calipers. Listen for any droning or humming noises from the rear axle, which would indicate if the previously flagged offside rear wheel bearing requires replacement. Further attention is required for the exhaust system, given the previous advisories for a leak and a defective front mounting. Listen for excessive noise under acceleration or a rattling sound from beneath the cabin. Additionally, inspect the current tyre sidewalls for cracking or perishing, as this has been a recurring advisory on the rear axle. Ensure the headlamp beams are correctly aligned and the dip beam pattern is clear, as these were specific points of failure in the most recent test.