2016 Ford Grand C-MAX 1.5L Diesel · FH66 JKU

The 2016 Ford Grand C-Max presents a mixed maintenance picture that has deteriorated noticeably in the most recent MOT cycle. The November 2025 pass at 63,832 miles came just six days after a failure, suggesting the previous owner addressed only the most urgent items to obtain a certificate rather than undertaking thorough preventative work. The most recent test still carried three advisories, including perishing nearside rear tyre rubber, light oil misting on both rear shock absorbers, and fluctuating rear service brake effort on both sides. These are not new problems. They appeared identically on the November 2025 failure, indicating the vehicle has been running with deteriorating rear suspension damping and inconsistent rear braking for at least several weeks if not longer. The trend is one of declining mechanical attention rather than steady upkeep. Mileage accumulation tells a broadly normal story for a vehicle of this age. The car recorded 51,624 miles in November 2023 and 58,100 miles by November 2024, representing approximately 6,476 miles over that twelve-month period. From November 2024 to November 2025 the car added a further 5,732 miles, taking the total to 63,832. This is consistent with typical annual use of around 6,000 to 6,500 miles and does not raise concerns about either excessive wear or suspiciously low accumulation that might suggest long periods of inactivity or clocking. The MOT history itself is reasonably complete with annual tests, though the 2024 pass was limited by under-body covers restricting inspection, which is worth noting. A buyer should pay close attention to the rear suspension and braking system during any in-person inspection. The repeated flagging of rear shock absorber oil misting suggests the dampers are weeping fluid and may be approaching the end of their effective service life, which will affect ride quality and braking stability on uneven surfaces. The fluctuating rear brake effort, noted on both the failure and the subsequent pass, points to possible uneven rear caliper operation, contaminated brake discs, or a deteriorating rear brake hose that is not releasing pressure consistently. The trailing arm bush wear picked up on the 2025 failure was apparently rectified for the pass, but worn suspension bushes tend to recur on this platform if the underlying arm assembly has not been replaced. Have a specialist check the condition of all rear suspension bushes, the rear brake calipers for free movement, and the thickness and condition of the rear brake discs and pads. Tyre condition also warrants scrutiny. The nearside rear tyre was flagged for cracking and perishing on both the failure and the pass, and the 2023 failure recorded both offside tyres below the 1.6mm legal minimum. This pattern suggests tyre maintenance has been reactive rather than proactive, with replacements deferred until tread was critically low or sidewalls were visibly degraded. Inner edge wear on both front tyres at the 2025 failure indicates the front suspension geometry may be out of specification, likely toe misalignment, which will accelerate tyre wear and affect steering precision. A four-wheel alignment check and thorough under-body inspection for corrosion around the rear subframe and suspension mounting points are strongly advised before purchase.