2008 Ford Mondeo 2.0L Diesel · FN57 CKC

The most recent MOT on 1 December 2022 was a pass, albeit with several advisories covering rear direction‑indicator lens discolouration, corrosion of both rear coil springs and a minor wiper inefficiency noted on the off‑side front unit. Earlier in the same test the vehicle also failed on a wiper performance issue and a dust‑cover fault on the anti‑roll‑bar linkage. Over the past three years the pattern shows a shift from outright failures for safety‑critical items (headlamp failure, tyre tread tears and major indicator colour errors) towards a predominance of advisory‑level defects, suggesting that the owner has addressed the most serious faults but that routine wear and corrosion are now the main concerns. At 126,503 miles the Mondeo averages roughly 7 000 miles per annum, which is typical for a vehicle of its age. The mileage record does not reveal any large gaps that would indicate prolonged periods of storage, yet the relatively modest annual usage means many components have been subject to calendar ageing rather than pure mileage wear. Consequently, items such as rubber bushings, seals and the battery are likely to have deteriorated from time rather than distance, while the drivetrain and engine have not been subjected to extreme stress loads. A prospective buyer should give particular attention to the rear coil springs, which have been recorded as corroded on both sides for several consecutive years. Visual inspection for rust flaking, loss of spring integrity and any audible clunk when the rear suspension is compressed is essential; replacement is advisable if any movement is felt. The rear direction‑indicator lenses are repeatedly noted as discoloured, indicating possible bulb or housing degradation – verify that both rear lamps illuminate correctly and that the lenses are clear. The off‑side front wiper was flagged as ineffective; test the wiper’s clearing ability in wet conditions and inspect the blade for wear. The anti‑roll‑bar linkage dust cover is no longer sealing, so check for dirt ingress and any looseness in the ball joint that could cause a subtle squeak when cornering. The oil leak, consistently described as non‑excessive, should be located – a slow leak from valve‑cover gaskets or the oil filter housing can lead to low oil levels over time; ensure the oil level is correct and look for fresh oil on the sump or under the engine. Front and rear suspension bushes were reported as worn; feel for play in the control arms and listen for knocking over bumps, and consider a full suspension inspection as worn bushes can accelerate tyre wear and affect handling. Brake pads were not visible with the wheels fitted in several tests, implying they may be close to the minimum thickness; during a test drive listen for any squeal or shudder on firm braking and have the pads and discs measured. The sub‑frame and suspension corrosion noted in 2021 should be examined for rust penetration that could compromise mounting points. Finally, because the vehicle is now 18 years old, time‑related checks are vital irrespective of mileage. Inspect all tyre sidewalls for cracking, dry rot or age‑related hardening, even if tread depth appears adequate, and replace any tyres older than six years. Verify the 12 V battery’s cranking voltage and check for any signs of sulphation or case swelling. Examine all fluid reservoirs – engine oil, coolant, brake fluid and power‑steering fluid – for colour change, particulate contamination or low levels, and be prepared for a full service if the last oil change date is unknown. Confirm that the service book contains regular stamps and that timing‑belt or chain intervals (if applicable) have been observed, as missed timing‑belt replacement on a vehicle of this age can lead to catastrophic engine damage. A thorough visual inspection combined with a careful test drive will reveal whether the remaining advisory items are simply cosmetic or indicative of deeper wear that will require imminent remedial work.