Official DVLA Record
MOT Valid
Road Tax Paid
Check Service Records

2018 Toyota C-HR 1.8L Hybrid electric · FN68 AAX

FN68 AAX

2018 Toyota C-HR (1.8L, hybrid electric). First registered 01/09/2018. Recorded mileage 50,660 miles. MOT valid until 23/03/2027. Taxed until 01/03/2027.

Make & Model
TOYOTA C-HR
Year / Origin
2018 · Nottingham
MOT Status
Valid until 23/03/2027
Road Tax
Taxed (01/03/2027)
Recorded Mileage
50,660 mi
ULEZ Compliance
ULEZ Exempt (Zero Emissions)
Fuel & Engine
HYBRID ELECTRIC · 1.8L
Reliability Guide
Common Faults
MOT Status
Valid
Valid until 23/03/2027
Tax Status
Taxed
Tax due 01/03/2027
Fuel Type
HYBRID ELECTRIC
Year
2018
Engine
1798cc
Mechanical Assessment

AI-generated interpretation of this vehicle’s MOT record — not an official statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

A pattern of recurring suspension and tyre wear advisories emerges across the MOT history of this 2018 Toyota C-HR, even though no test has resulted in a failure. The most recent assessment on 26 March 2026 recorded a clean pass with no defects, which on the surface is encouraging, yet this clean outcome sits against a backdrop of repeat advisories over the preceding four years. In July 2025 the nearside and offside front suspension arm pins or bushes were noted as worn but not resulting in excessive movement, alongside three tyre edge-wear advisories covering both front tyres and the nearside rear. The same front suspension arm pin or bush advisories had already appeared on the 15 July 2024 test, indicating a progressive rather than resolved issue. Earlier, the July 2022 test flagged a pitted or scored offside rear brake disc and an offside front tyre worn on edge. The only tests with completely clean records are 2023 and 2026, suggesting that suspension and tyre wear are the dominant mechanical themes for this vehicle. With 50,660 miles recorded over approximately eight years, this C-HR has been driven at an average of around 6,300 miles annually, which is broadly consistent with typical usage for its age. The mileage progression across tests shows steady accumulation rather than sudden jumps or extended gaps, with no multi-year periods where the vehicle appears to have been off the road. There is no recorded evidence in the MOT data of an extended lay-up that would raise concerns about dormant component degradation such as seized brakes or deteriorated tyres through prolonged standing. For a hybrid crossover of this age and mileage, the wear pattern observed aligns with components reaching the natural end of their service life on a vehicle in regular but moderate use. The repeated front suspension arm pin or bush advisories warrant close physical inspection before purchase. On a test drive, listen for clonking or knocking noises from the front suspension when traversing speed humps or uneven road surfaces, and pay particular attention to vagueness or delay in steering response that could indicate the bushes have loosened beyond the threshold previously recorded. With the wheels unloaded, the buyer or a technician should manually check the front lower suspension arms for vertical and rotational play at the pin or bush mounting, as a component flagged in two consecutive tests is likely to have progressed further. Uneven or feathered tyre wear, particularly on the inner or outer edges as previously recorded, should also be examined, as persistent edge wear despite replacement tyres often points to misalignment, suspension geometry issues, or worn bushes altering camber. The 2022 advisory regarding a pitted or scored offside rear brake disc suggests the discs on this vehicle have experienced corrosion or wear consistent with mixed driving conditions, potentially including urban stop-start use where discs do not get the benefit of regular high-temperature operation to keep them clean. On inspection, the buyer should feel for brake pedal pulsation or vibration under firm application, which can indicate disc runout or thickness variation, and check for any grinding or scraping sounds that might suggest the wear has progressed beyond the previous advisory threshold. The rear brake system generally warrants a visual check for binding calipers, given that scoring was previously recorded on one side only. Finally, a thorough road test on a variety of surfaces including motorway speeds, twisting B-roads, and uneven town streets will be essential to confirm whether the suspension and brake components previously flagged have remained within acceptable limits or have deteriorated further since the most recent clean test.

FN68 AAX Key Findings

  • 5 MOT tests recorded
  • Latest MOT passed on 24/03/2026
  • 50,660 miles recorded at latest MOT
  • No defects recorded at the latest MOT
  • Recurring tyres items (6 mentions)

Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.

MOT Roadworthiness Analysis
93
/ 100 · Excellent
DVSA Test Records Evaluated

MOT Roadworthiness: Excellent

This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.

✓ Valid MOT
✓ Taxed
✓ Exceptional MOT pass rate (100%)
Experian Provenance Check

Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for FN68AAX

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Finance
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Write-off
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Salvage
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Imported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Exported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Scrapped
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Destruction
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
V5C Logbook
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee Included

Verify Outstanding Finance & Provenance Before Buying

Free DVLA records only confirm roadworthiness. Protect yourself against active finance repossession, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage fraud with an official Experian check.

✓ One-off payment (no subscription)✓ Instant on screen + PDF emailed✓ Official Experian registry✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay / Cards

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

ULEZ Compliant

Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence

Estimate current market value

Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.

Reliability & Known Issues

Known faults for Toyota Toyota C-HR

Our database tracks 3 specific mechanical faults and recurring failure patterns identified across UK MOT testing stations for this generation.

FN68 AAX Mileage History

  1. 28/07/202228,316 mi
  2. 24/07/202333,206 mi+4,890 mi
  3. 15/07/202437,487 mi+4,281 mi
  4. 21/07/202542,519 mi+5,032 mi
  5. 24/03/202650,660 mi+8,141 mi

Average of roughly 6,113 miles per year across 5 recorded odometer readings.

FN68 AAX MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: 7 Sept 2026, 12:03
MOT Analysis

Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

5 MOT tests are recorded for this 2018 Toyota C-Hr (FN68 AAX) between July 2022 and March 2026.

The record contains 5 passes and 0 failures.

The record shows no MOT failures, although 11 advisory notices note items to monitor.

Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Tyres (6 issues), Suspension (4 issues), Brakes (1 issue). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.

In total 11 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY

Buyer's Guide & Inspection Advisory

Expert automotive synthesis from historical MOT defect records and market benchmarks.

Buying Score
76/100
Risk Level
Low
Low
Est. Annual Cost
£1,200-£1,500
Mileage
At 50,660 miles over roughly eight years...

Our Verdict

The Toyota C-HR FN68AAX presents a gener

Given the recurring advisories on front suspension arm pins and bushes at both the 2024 and 2025 tests, a pre-purchase inspection should focus on these components. While neither advisory was severe enough to fail the MOT, repeated mention across consecutive tests suggests wear is progressing and replacement may be due. Budget for new tyres, as the 2025 test noted both nearside and offside fronts at the legal limit with cracking or perishing. Although the MOT history shows no recorded service items, ask the seller for any documentation of work carried out in response to the advisories, particularly on the suspension.

The 1.8-litre hybrid system is generally dependable, but check that the hybrid battery warning light behaves correctly on startup and that the transition between petrol and electric modes is smooth. Given that the 2022 test also flagged a worn offside rear brake disc, inspect the rear brakes for any pulsing or scoring when test driving. The C-HR's distinctive coupé styling can compromise rear visibility, so confirm any parking sensors or reversing camera are functioning. As this car is approaching eight years old, check the age and condition of the 12-volt auxiliary battery, which is separate from the hybrid drive battery and typically needs replacing around this age.

The 1.8-litre hybrid C-HR typically returns around 55-65 mpg in real-world mixed driving, dropping lower on motorway runs. Insurance sits in groups roughly 14-17 depending on trim, so expect mid-range premiums for a mid-size SUV. Road tax is free for hybrids registered before April 2017 standards adjustments, but this September 2018 car falls into a low-cost band of around £20-£155 annually depending on exact CO2 figure. Routine maintenance such as tyres, brakes and suspension components will be the main costs; budget for suspension work given the advisories. Overall, expect £1,200-£1,500 per year covering fuel, tax, insurance and routine servicing for a vehicle of this age and mileage.

The MOT history points clearly to two areas requiring scrutiny: front suspension bushes and tyres. Both nearside and offside front lower suspension arm pins or bushes were flagged in 2024 and again in 2025, which is unusual to see repeated across tests and warrants a physical check. Bushes are relatively inexpensive individually but can be time-consuming to replace if corroded into the arm, so get a written quote before committing. Tyres were also flagged at both the 2022 and 2025 tests for wear on edge and cracking, suggesting either alignment issues, heavy steering usage, or simply age-related deterioration of the rubber compound.

Beyond the MOT history, inspect the 1.8-litre hybrid system's behaviour during a cold start, ensuring the engine cuts in smoothly and that no warning lights remain illuminated. Check the rear brake discs as the 2022 test recorded pitting on the offside rear disc; uneven wear could indicate a sticking caliper. Look under the car for any signs of corrosion, particularly around the rear arch and underbody, although Toyota's build quality is generally good. Finally, verify all electrical features work correctly, especially given the hybrid system's reliance on multiple sensors and the C-HR's typically well-equipped interior.

This September 2018 Toyota C-HR has covered 50,660 miles across five MOT tests, all without failure. The recent 2026 test was completely clean, while earlier tests flagged advisories relating to front suspension bushes (2024 and 2025) and tyre condition (2022 and 2025). The mileage of 50,660 over roughly eight years equates to about 6,300 miles annually, which sits below the C-HR model average of 8,344 miles per year. The 1.8-litre hybrid powertrain is well regarded for efficiency, and Toyota's hybrid reputation adds appeal for running-cost-conscious buyers.

Across 96,107 Toyota C-HR vehicles analysed, the model achieves an MOT pass rate of 88.4%, with the most common failure reasons being tyres, suspension arms and headlamps. This places the C-HR in a respectable reliability bracket, though the front suspension bush wear seen on this individual car aligns with the model's broader pattern.

Reviewed by the IsItAGoodCar editorial team — Verified automotive analysis synthesized from official vehicle registries.

Data Sources

DVSA

Official MOT test logs & failure reasons

DVLA

Tax, registration & powertrain specs

Experian

Finance, stolen markers & total loss

AI Analysis

Historical fault & advisory patterns