2009 Ford Mondeo 2.0L Diesel · FP09 MLJ

The most recent MOT on 28 July 2026 was a pass, though it carried four advisories concerning the central rear exhaust mounting, corrosion of both rear coil springs and a minor lighting fault. Earlier in the same week the vehicle failed a test for a dangerous front seat mounting and a major anti‑roll‑bar dust‑cover defect, and over the past two years the record shows a mixture of passes and failures with recurring brake‑pad wear, tyre edge wear and exhaust‑mounting issues. The pattern suggests that while the owner has managed to keep the car road‑legal, a number of wear items are being deferred rather than replaced, indicating a maintenance trend that is stabilising but still exhibits lingering problems that need attention. At 237,794 mi the Mondeo averages roughly 13,900 mi per annum, well above the typical UK usage of 7‑10 k mi per year. This level of mileage accelerates wear on the suspension bushings, coil springs, brake components and tyre carcasses, and it also raises the probability of internal engine and transmission fatigue. There are no obvious mileage gaps in the MOT history, implying the car has been driven fairly consistently rather than sitting idle for long periods, which tends to exacerbate corrosion on the rear suspension and exhaust brackets that are already flagged. A prospective buyer should give particular focus to the rear exhaust mounting – a defective mount can produce a resonant rattle at low engine speeds and may allow the exhaust to contact the under‑tray, leading to premature corrosion. The corroded rear coil springs should be inspected for cracks or loss of spring rate; any clunking or uneven ride height when the car is bounced indicates a failing spring or worn mounting bush. The anti‑roll‑bar ball‑joint dust covers on both front and rear are no longer sealing, so check for excessive play or squeaks when cornering, and verify that the bushings are not shredded. The off‑side front seat mounting, flagged as dangerous, must be examined for loose bolts or worn rails; a loose seat will produce a noticeable shift under lateral loads. Brake pads on the off‑side rear are already below the 1.5 mm safety limit, and the rear discs show surface pitting; expect reduced braking efficiency, possible pedal pulsation and a higher likelihood of brake fade, especially when the vehicle is heavily loaded. The tyres have been noted as worn close to the legal limit and with nail punctures, so inspect tread depth across the width, look for sidewall cracking from age, and verify that the tyre pressure retention system is intact. Beyond the specific defects, the high mileage and age warrant a thorough check of time‑related items. Examine the 12‑volt battery for sulphation and verify its cranking voltage; a battery of this vintage often needs replacement even if it still holds a charge. Inspect all fluid reservoirs – engine oil, coolant, brake fluid and power‑steering fluid – for colour, level and any signs of contamination, as fluids degrade over calendar time regardless of mileage. Look for corrosion on the chassis, especially around the rear suspension mounting points and exhaust brackets, and ensure that any rust is not penetrating structural members. Finally, confirm that the service book contains regular oil changes, timing‑belt or chain service (if applicable), and that any major components such as the clutch or gearbox have been inspected or replaced in line with the vehicle’s mileage. A comprehensive test‑drive listening for suspension clunks, brake judder, exhaust rattles and seat movement will give a clear indication of the current mechanical health before committing to purchase.