2016 Ford Kuga 2.0L Diesel · GP16 AAJ

The 2016 Ford Kuga’s most recent MOT test on 2025-07-01—just ten months ago—shows an unusual but technically clean record, with two consecutive tests at the same mileage (79,765) yielding one pass and one fail without recorded defects. This suggests either an administrative error in the fail (common for minor oversights) or a deliberate retest after a non-critical advisory was overlooked. No recurring faults or advisories appear in the history, and the vehicle has passed every other annual test since 2022 without failings. The lack of repeated issues indicates no obvious pattern of neglect or mechanical degradation, though the retest raises caution about whether minor concerns were addressed between tests. Mileage progression reveals a steady accumulation of approximately 8,000 miles annually, which aligns with typical usage for a vehicle of this age. The gap between the 2024 (69,658 miles) and 2025 tests (79,765 miles) spans just under a year, with no extended periods of inactivity or rapid mileage spikes. This consistency suggests the vehicle was regularly driven rather than stored, reducing the risk of prolonged wear on components like suspension bushes or fuel system seals. The absence of mileage jumps or prolonged stagnation also implies fewer opportunities for corrosion to develop in underbody or wheel arches. Given the clean MOT history, a buyer should prioritise an in-person inspection of high-wear areas that aren’t always captured in a test. Focus on the suspension—particularly the rear coil springs and bushes—for signs of uneven wear or binding, as these are common failure points in this model. The brakes, while not flagged in tests, should be checked for uneven disc thickness or warping, especially if the vehicle has been driven hard. Examine the underbody for corrosion around the sills, wheel arches, and exhaust system, as these areas are prone to rust in older models. Finally, verify the condition of the exhaust system for leaks or excessive rust, as emissions-related failures are occasionally missed in tests. The lack of advisories in past tests makes these areas particularly worth scrutinising.