2015 Renault Clio 1.5L Diesel · K10 RBD

The Renault Clio’s most recent MOT test on 2025-10-22 confirms it remains roadworthy, though the immediate preceding test on 2025-10-09—just 13 days earlier—was a failure without recorded defects. This abrupt retest suggests either a temporary administrative error or a last-minute adjustment to meet minor, non-critical thresholds, as no defects were logged. The overall trend since 2022 shows consistent pass rates with no recurring advisories or major faults, indicating the vehicle has avoided serious mechanical issues during its service life. However, the lack of defects on failure does not preclude underlying problems, particularly in areas like suspension alignment or brake wear that might not trigger a fail but could affect handling or stopping performance. Mileage progression reveals a steady accumulation of approximately 7,350 miles annually, which aligns with typical usage for a vehicle of this age. The gap between tests is standard—12 months between 2022 and 2023, and again between 2023 and 2024—with no extended periods of inactivity or rapid mileage spikes. The final 16,212 miles between the 2024 and 2025 tests occurred in just over a year, suggesting consistent driving rather than neglect or aggressive use. There is no evidence of prolonged storage, which could have accelerated wear on components like seals or battery health. Given the absence of recorded defects or advisories in the MOT history, a prospective buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of high-wear items that often fail silently. Focus on the suspension—particularly the rear bushes and coil springs—for excessive play or corrosion, as these are common points of failure in Renault Clios of this era. The braking system warrants close examination, including rear caliper binding (a known issue in some models) and disc thickness, as repeated failures on tread depth imply basic maintenance may have been overlooked. Structural integrity should also be checked for signs of rust in wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, especially given the vehicle’s age and typical exposure to UK road conditions. Tyre condition, including uneven wear patterns, should be verified, as the history suggests tread depth may not have been consistently monitored.