2013 Chevrolet Orlando 2.0L Diesel · KE13 AEB

The vehicle’s most recent MOT on 2022-09-06 at 85,138 miles showed a pass with no defects, but a prior failure on 2022-09-02 at 85,136 miles—just four days earlier—suggests a potential inconsistency in the testing process. No defects were recorded in either test, leaving the cause of the failure unclear. Since the last valid MOT, the car has not been retested, and with the current date of 2026-07-22, it has exceeded the typical three-year interval for MOT compliance. This gap raises concerns about unverified mechanical integrity, particularly given the vehicle’s age and mileage. The absence of recorded defects in earlier tests indicates a stable maintenance history up to 2022, but the lack of recent data limits confidence in its current roadworthiness. The vehicle’s mileage of 85,138 miles over 13 years aligns with an average of 6,549 miles annually, reflecting typical usage for its age. MOT records show consistent annual testing from 2019 to 2022, with mileage increments of approximately 9,000 miles per year. No significant gaps or rapid accumulation are evident in the data, suggesting regular operation. However, the 2022-09-02 failure and subsequent pass at nearly identical mileage imply either a transient issue or an administrative error. The lack of defects in prior tests, including a 2021 pass at 74,403 miles, indicates no systemic mechanical decline, but the absence of recent inspections leaves critical components unassessed. A buyer should prioritise inspecting the suspension, brakes, and exhaust systems, as these are common failure points in vehicles of this age. The 2022 MOT failure, though unexplained, warrants scrutiny of potential issues such as binding calipers, worn brake discs, or corrosion in the exhaust system. Additionally, the vehicle’s structural integrity should be verified, particularly around the chassis and body panels, to rule out hidden rust or damage. Given the three-year gap since the last MOT, a thorough pre-purchase inspection is essential to confirm that no critical faults have emerged. The absence of recorded defects in earlier tests is reassuring but does not replace a hands-on evaluation of the car’s current condition.