2009 Peugeot 3008 1.6L Diesel · KM59 UTE

This Peugeot 3008 shows a concerning pattern of repeated MOT failures without recorded defects, despite passing tests in intervening years. The most recent test on 2024-09-27 passed, but the immediate prior attempt on 2024-09-13 failed—an unusual sequence suggesting either a last-minute correction or a persistent but intermittent issue that evaded detection. The 2023 cycle repeated the same pattern, with a failure on 2023-09-12 (no defects noted) followed by a pass on the same day, which is statistically improbable under standard MOT procedures. This inconsistency implies either a lack of thorough pre-test maintenance or a test centre error, though the latter is less likely given the repeated failures. The trend is unstable, with no clear resolution to underlying concerns. The vehicle’s mileage of 188,827 miles over 17 years (as of 2026) averages approximately 11,107 miles annually, which is typical for its age. There are no obvious gaps or spikes in usage between tests, though the lack of defect details in failures makes it impossible to correlate wear with specific intervals. The most recent MOT was conducted just over 11 months ago, which is within the legal requirement but does not provide recent confirmation of critical components like suspension integrity or brake performance. Given the age and mileage, buyers should expect some consumable wear, but the repeated failures suggest deeper issues may have been overlooked. Given the history, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension system, particularly the rear axle where binding calipers or worn bushes are common in vehicles of this age. The repeated failures without recorded defects raise suspicion of recurring but non-obvious issues—such as corrosion in the subframe, degraded coil springs, or failing stabiliser links—which are not always captured in a standard MOT. Brake discs and pads should also be scrutinised, as binding or uneven wear often goes unnoticed until failure. Structural rust, particularly around wheel arches and sills, is another critical area given the vehicle’s age, even if not flagged in past tests. The absence of defect details in failures makes it essential to verify whether previous owners addressed underlying problems or simply passed the test through minor adjustments.