2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager 2.8L Diesel · LB55 XXG

The vehicle achieved an MOT pass on 20 January 2026, though the test was accompanied by three tyre-related advisories affecting both front wheels and the offside rear, alongside a minor defect for a slightly damaged offside obligatory mirror and an advisory for a discoloured offside rear direction indicator. When considered alongside the earlier 2025 history, the trend is one of mild deterioration rather than outright worsening: the January 2025 attempt failed on lamp defects and a serious parking brake issue, after which the same date produced a pass once those defects were presumably rectified, followed by the largely clean 2026 result. The recurring mirror damage across consecutive tests suggests a longstanding minor issue that has not been addressed, while the tyre advisories emerging only at the most recent test indicate that the vehicle's tyre condition has reached a point requiring attention, although no immediate failure was recorded. The recorded mileage of 118,082 miles over a twenty-year registration period equates to an average annual usage of approximately 5,900 miles, which is considerably below the national average for a vehicle of this age and suggests either genuinely low use or extended periods of inactivity. The gap between the March 2023 test and the January 2025 tests implies some 22 months without recorded MOT activity, and the very low annual figure raises the likelihood that the vehicle has spent significant time standing. For a Chrysler Grand Voyager of this vintage, prolonged standing can be particularly detrimental, encouraging moisture ingress into brake hydraulic systems, oxidation of brake disc surfaces, corrosion of exhaust hangers and underbody components, and degradation of polymer and rubber items such as suspension bushes, drive belts, and coolant hoses. The fact that a parking brake defect was identified and rectified in early 2025 is consistent with caliper seizure or rear brake mechanism corrosion caused by infrequent operation. Given the age and likely standing periods, a prospective buyer should carry out thorough physical checks beyond the MOT record. Inspect all four tyres carefully for sidewall perishing and cracking, which is common on ageing rubber regardless of tread depth, and note that the advisory tyres may already require replacement even where tread appears adequate. Examine the brake discs for surface rust and lipping, and verify that all calipers release cleanly by ensuring the vehicle rolls in gear on a slight slope; any binding may indicate seized caliper pistons from lack of use. Underneath the vehicle, check for corrosion on the underbody, exhaust hangers, suspension arms, and subframe mounting points, paying particular attention to the rear brake mechanism and handbrake cables for stiffness. On a test drive, listen for clonks or knocks from the front and rear suspension that could signify perished bushes or worn coil springs, and feel for any pulling to one side under braking that might indicate uneven caliper function or a seized flexible hose. The offside rear direction indicator discolouration is typically a simple bulb housing issue, but the persistent mirror damage warrants confirmation that all mirror glass remains secure and provides an adequate rearward view. Finally, age-related servicing items should be verified even where mileage is low, as calendar-based degradation applies regardless of distance covered. The 12V battery is highly likely to be nearing the end of its service life given the vehicle's age, and a load test or simple date-code inspection is advisable, particularly if the vehicle has stood for extended periods. Coolant, brake fluid, and automatic transmission fluid (if applicable) should all be considered overdue for renewal based on time rather than mileage, as brake fluid is hygroscopic and degrades over time, potentially compromising braking performance. Inspect the timing belt or chain replacement history, as a twenty-year-old vehicle may be well past the recommended replacement interval for these components. The service history should be examined for evidence of regular oil and filter changes, even at low mileage, as infrequent oil changes combined with short journeys accelerate internal engine wear. With appropriate attention to these age-related concerns and the tyre condition flagged at the most recent test, this Grand Voyager can remain a serviceable vehicle, though the low-use history demands a more comprehensive inspection than the MOT record alone would suggest.