2013 Peugeot 208 1.4L Diesel · LG63 UBL

A recurring theme of front‑end wear and a persistent CV joint boot fault defines the mechanical picture of this 2013 Peugeot 208. The latest MOT on 18 April 2026 was passed, yet it still carried advisories for a front brake disc approaching the wear limit and a defective front exhaust mounting, echoing similar notes from the 2025 and 2024 tests. More concerning is the off‑side outer drive‑shaft CV boot that was recorded as split and insecure in both the 2022 failure and the 2025 failure, a defect that has not been rectified despite subsequent passes. The pattern shows that while the vehicle clears the basic safety thresholds, it carries a handful of unresolved wear items that have lingered across several years. At 92 847 mi the car averages roughly 7 100 mi per year, a mileage rate that sits comfortably within typical UK usage for a thirteen‑year‑old hatchback. The MOT chronology reveals no large gaps in testing, with annual examinations from 2019 onward, indicating the mileage has been recorded consistently. This steady accumulation suggests normal wear on consumables such as brake discs, tyres and suspension components, but it also means that any latent issues, like the CV boot split, have had ample mileage to potentially exacerbate wear on the constant‑velocity joint and surrounding bearings. Prospective buyers should give particular attention to the front brake discs; the advisory notes describe them as worn, pitted or scored, which can manifest as reduced braking feel, pulsation under hard braking or increased pedal travel. A visual inspection for scoring and a tactile test of pedal firmness are advisable, and replacement may be required soon if thickness is near the minimum. The front exhaust mounting defect is likely to produce a noticeable rattling or vibration at low engine speeds, especially when the engine is under load; a thorough audit of the mounting brackets and any cracked or corroded clamps is warranted. The off‑side CV boot split should be examined for oil leakage around the joint and for any clicking or clunking noises when turning or accelerating, symptoms that would indicate joint wear beyond the boot failure. The headlamp aim failure recorded in 2025 points to a mis‑aligned off‑side headlamp, which can be checked by observing the beam pattern on a wall at the prescribed distance; an incorrect aim may cause uneven illumination and could be a simple adjustment or may hint at mounting issues. Tyre wear advisories from 2021 and 2019 – front tyres close to the legal limit and rear tyres showing cracking – should be verified visually for tread depth, sidewall integrity and uniform wear patterns, as uneven wear can signal alignment or suspension problems. Finally, the engine MIL warning that caused a 2025 failure suggests an intermittent fault; a scan for stored fault codes and a functional test of the engine management system are prudent before committing to purchase. Addressing these specific items will give a clearer picture of the car’s current roadworthiness and the likely cost of bringing it to a fully reliable state.