2016 Ford KA 1.2L Petrol · LL16 NMA

The 2016 Ford Ka has demonstrated a consistent roadworthiness record over its MOT history, with the most recent test on 27 May 2025—just over a year ago—confirming no defects and a clean pass. This suggests the vehicle has been maintained at a basic level without any recurring mechanical failures or advisory notes that would indicate worsening structural or drivetrain issues. The absence of advisories or faults across all tests, including the duplicate entry for April 2023, reinforces that the vehicle has not experienced any major recurring problems. However, the lack of defects does not preclude hidden wear, particularly in components subject to gradual deterioration such as suspension bushes, coil springs, or brake caliper binding, which are not always detectable without a thorough mechanical inspection. The recorded mileage of 32,652 miles at the time of the latest MOT reflects unusually low annual usage—approximately 3,265 miles per year—given the vehicle’s age. This pattern is evident when comparing the intervals between tests: the gap between the 2022 and 2023 tests spans roughly 12 months with only 3,024 miles accumulated, while the 2023 to 2024 interval covers another 2,498 miles over 12 months. Such low mileage could imply prolonged periods of non-use, which may accelerate wear in areas prone to static stress, such as suspension seals or battery corrosion. Conversely, it may also suggest the vehicle was stored in a controlled environment, mitigating some deterioration risks. The consistency of mileage accumulation, however, does not indicate aggressive driving or excessive strain on critical components. Given the clean MOT history, a prospective buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of suspension components, including the condition of bushes, coil springs, and shock absorbers, as these are often overlooked in low-mileage vehicles but can degrade over time even with minimal use. Brake calipers and discs should be examined for uneven wear or binding, particularly if the vehicle has been stationary for extended periods, as moisture and corrosion can accelerate failure. Tyre tread depth and lateral wear patterns, despite no recorded faults, warrant scrutiny—failing twice on tread in prior tests (if any had occurred) would have been noted, but visual inspection remains essential. Finally, the underbody should be checked for corrosion, especially around wheel arches and suspension mounts, as rust can compromise structural integrity without immediate MOT failure. The absence of advisories does not guarantee these areas are free from deterioration.