2010 Honda CR-V 2.0L Petrol · LS10 SVR

The 2010 Honda CR-V presents a stable roadworthiness record over the past two years, with the most recent MOT on 14 January 2026 at 106,555 miles passing without any defects. The only irregularity in the history is the failed test on 29 January 2025 at 101,366 miles, which notably carried no recorded defects—an anomaly that suggests either a procedural error or a test conducted under unusual circumstances. Since then, the vehicle has maintained a clean slate through two further annual tests, indicating no recurring mechanical or structural issues. This consistency implies that, if the mileage has been accurately recorded, the CR-V has either been well-maintained by its previous owners or has benefited from components that have aged gracefully. The absence of advisories or defects in recent years reduces immediate concerns, though the failed test without explanation remains an outlier worth clarifying with the seller. The mileage accumulation of approximately 6,660 miles per year aligns closely with the average for a 16-year-old vehicle, suggesting either steady but not excessive use or periods of inactivity balanced by occasional driving. The gap between the 2024 and 2025 tests shows a 4,191-mile increase (from 97,186 to 101,377 miles), which is unremarkable and consistent with typical annual usage. There are no signs of rapid mileage accumulation that might indicate neglect or heavy-duty service, nor are there prolonged periods of inactivity that could raise concerns about fluid degradation or component deterioration. The clean MOT history over the past two years, combined with this steady mileage pattern, supports the view that the CR-V has not been subjected to extreme conditions or abuse. For a buyer, the primary focus should be on components that are not routinely checked during MOTs but are critical to long-term reliability. Given the lack of recorded defects, attention should turn to the suspension—specifically the condition of the rear coil springs and suspension bushes, which are common wear points on this model and may not always be flagged unless visibly degraded. The brake system, including the condition of the rear brake calipers and discs, should be inspected for binding or uneven wear, particularly since the 2025 failed test lacks explanation. Structural integrity is less of a concern given the absence of corrosion advisories, but a thorough check for surface rust in wheel arches, sills, and underbody panels is prudent. Finally, while the MOT history is clean, the failed test without defects is unusual and warrants follow-up to ensure no underlying issues were overlooked.