2015 Renault Clio 1.1L Petrol · MH05 MFH

A notably sparse MOT history defines this Renault Clio, with three test entries across an eleven-year lifecycle yielding no recorded advisories or component defects at any stage. While the absence of flagged items superficially suggests sound roadworthiness, the parallel pass and fail entries on both 2025-02-10 and 2026-02-09 warrant scrutiny. Duplicate results on the same date typically indicate that an initial test identified a failure or refusal, prompting immediate rectification and re-test on the same day rather than a return visit. The lack of defect details on the failure entries means the precise reasons for those non-pass outcomes are not captured in the official record, leaving the buyer without visibility of which systems were deficient. This pattern suggests the vehicle has been maintained to a test-pass standard but has experienced at least two recent rectification events that prevented a clean first-time pass. With 95,590 miles accumulated over eleven years, this Clio returns an annual mileage of approximately 8,690 miles, which sits squarely within the expected band for a car of this age and class. The mileage progression between test entries is consistent and shows no alarming spikes or extended stationary periods that would typically be flagged in MOT records through reduced annual accumulation. Continuous usage at a moderate rate generally keeps mechanical components, fluids, and seals in regular working order, reducing the risk of dried seals, seized calipers, or perished rubber associated with low-mileage or laid-up vehicles. However, the lack of advisory data across nearly 100,000 miles of motoring is unusual, as most vehicles of this age and mileage typically accumulate at least some wear-related notes on items such as brake components, suspension bushes, or exhaust mountings. The absence of these records could indicate either diligent pre-test rectification by the previous keeper or, less favourably, a tendency to address items only when they approach failure thresholds. For a prospective buyer, the immediate priority is establishing precisely what caused the two same-day failures recorded in 2025 and 2026, as these defects were rectified prior to the re-test but their nature remains undisclosed. Requesting any documentation or invoices relating to those repairs would provide vital insight into whether the issues were minor, such as a blown bulb or emissions-related adjustment, or more substantial mechanical concerns affecting braking, steering, or suspension integrity. On a physical inspection, particular attention should be paid to the components most commonly implicated in mid-life Clio MOT failures, including the front suspension wishbones and anti-roll bar drop links, which are prone to bush wear and play, and the rear brake shoes and adjusters, which can seize on higher-mileage examples. The coil springs should be examined for corrosion and possible fracture, while the exhaust system, particularly the flexi-section and rear mounting, warrants a check for blowing or corrosion given the vehicle's age. On a test drive, listen carefully for clonks or knocks from the front suspension when traversing speed bumps or uneven tarmac, as worn wishbone bushes are a frequent Clio trait that may not have been flagged if play was within tester tolerance at the most recent assessment. Apply the brakes firmly from speed and check for pulling to either side, pedal sponginess, or vibration through the steering wheel, all of which could indicate binding calipers, worn discs, or flexible hose degradation. At low speed, listen for any rumble or whine from the front wheels that could point to wheel bearing deterioration, a known consumable item on this model. Finally, with the engine warmed, observe the exhaust smoke on start-up and during acceleration, and check for any oil leaks around the cam cover and sump gasket areas, as higher-mileage Clios frequently exhibit minor seepage that, while not test-failing, warrants monitoring.