2010 Peugeot 3008 1.6L Diesel · SL60 WMF

A ten-year gap in MOT testing on this 2010 Peugeot 3008 leaves a notable void in its documented roadworthiness history, with only one recorded pass dated 29 October 2021 and no defects or advisories entered at that examination. While the clean result is encouraging on the surface, the absence of more recent DVSA evidence means there is no official verification of the vehicle's condition since late 2021, which is particularly significant for a car now approaching sixteen years of age. The single pass recorded offers reassurance about its state at that time, but it does not constitute a track record in the conventional sense. A prospective buyer must therefore place greater reliance on a pre-purchase inspection than would typically be necessary for a vehicle with continuous annual testing. Recorded mileage of 84,118 miles against a sixteen-year age equates to an average annual accumulation of roughly 5,257 miles, which is notably below the typical usage pattern for a family crossover of this type. Such low average mileage generally reduces wear on high-stress components such as the clutch, turbocharger and drivetrain, but it can also bring its own concerns, particularly regarding the deterioration of rubber and polymer components that age regardless of distance covered. Suspension bushes, engine and gearbox mountings, coolant hoses, drivebelt rubber, and brake hydraulic seals all suffer from material degradation over time, and a vehicle that has covered relatively few miles per year may exhibit premature ageing-related faults rather than wear-related ones. Any evidence of extended periods off the road, or conversely of sudden mileage escalation between tests, would be worth clarifying through the V5 and service documentation. Given the lengthy testing gap and the inherent vulnerabilities of the Peugeot 3008 platform, particular attention should be paid during a physical inspection to areas known to suffer on this model. The diesel variants are especially prone to timing belt-related damage if replacement intervals have been overlooked, so documentary evidence of a recent cam belt and tensioner change is essential, along with confirmation of the diesel particulate filter having been actively used on sustained runs rather than subjected to repeated short journeys. On a road test, listen for any knocking or clonking from the front suspension over uneven surfaces, which would indicate worn lower wishbone bushes or anti-roll bar drop links, both common failure points on this chassis. Brake pedal feel should be firm and progressive; any sponginess or excessive travel would warrant investigation of the servo and hydraulic fluid condition. The 1.6-litre e-HDi and 2.0-litre HDi diesel engines fitted to the 3008 are also known for issues with the injectors, EGR valve, and turbo actuator, so the engine should be observed from cold start for any excessive smoke, erratic idle, or illuminated emissions-related warning lights on the dashboard. Steering should remain precise without any knocking or vibration through the wheel, and the electronic handbrake, a known weak point, should be confirmed as releasing and reapplying cleanly without warning messages. Examine the undercarriage closely for corrosion, particularly around the rear axle mounting areas, suspension subframes, and brake and fuel lines, as these are areas where age-related deterioration rather than mileage typically takes its toll on this platform. A final check of the timing belt replacement record, full service history stamps, and any evidence of recall work completed would substantially strengthen confidence in this otherwise lightly used but ageing Peugeot 3008.