2014 Peugeot 2008 1.6L Diesel · SM14 AAV

The Peugeot 2008 has passed its most recent MOT on June 2, 2026, at 115,602 miles, but only after failing the previous test on June 1 due to a critically worn nearside front suspension arm ball joint—a failure that had not appeared in earlier records. While the June 2026 test cleared the vehicle, it still carried multiple advisories for tyre wear, headlamp contamination, and a child seat obstructing belt inspection, all of which had persisted since at least 2025. The trend here is mixed: serious mechanical issues like the suspension joint failure emerged suddenly, whereas minor wear items (tyres, lights, child seat fitment) have remained unresolved for over a year. The binding rear brake and thin brake pads from 2025 suggest deferred maintenance, though these were not repeated in the latest tests. Overall, the vehicle’s roadworthiness is currently stable but only after addressing a significant suspension defect—one that should not have been ignored for so long. The mileage accumulation of 115,602 miles over 12 years aligns closely with the average for its age, averaging around 9,634 miles annually. However, the gaps between MOTs reveal inconsistent upkeep: the 2024 test at 98,319 miles was over a year before the next at 108,471 miles in June 2025, followed by another 7,127 miles in just 15 days—a sharp spike likely due to urgent repairs before the failed test. The rapid mileage jump in early 2025, combined with the binding brake and worn suspension components, implies the vehicle was driven despite known faults, increasing wear on other systems. The most recent 7,200-mile interval between the June 2025 and June 2026 tests suggests the owner has since prioritised compliance over preventive maintenance. A prospective buyer should treat the suspension as a high-risk area, particularly the front ball joint, which failed catastrophically in June 2026 after years of minor bush wear advisories. The rear brakes also demand immediate scrutiny: the 2025 binding condition and thin pads indicate potential caliper or hydraulic issues, while the front sub-frame corrosion—though not structurally compromised—should be checked for hidden weakening. Tyre wear patterns, especially the nearside front tyre’s edge wear, may point to alignment problems linked to the suspension defects. Finally, the recurring child seat and rear lamp faults, while not safety-critical, reflect a lack of attention to basic compliance—something that could mask deeper neglect. The vehicle’s most recent pass does not guarantee reliability, given the sudden suspension failure and deferred brake work. Any purchase should include a pre-MOT inspection by a qualified mechanic, with particular focus on the front suspension components, rear brake system, and sub-frame integrity. The absence of major structural failures is a positive sign, but the pattern of ignored advisories and last-minute repairs raises concerns about long-term dependability.