2010 Ford KA 1.2L Petrol · SUI 5034

The most recent MOT test on 2026-04-28 resulted in a passing grade, though it included advisories that warrant careful consideration. While this latest test shows no major failures, the vehicle’s MOT history reveals a pattern of recurring issues that suggest ongoing wear and potential long-term vulnerabilities. The 2025 test, which included both major and advisory failures—such as a rough rear wheel bearing and worn front anti-roll bar linkage ball joints—indicates that the suspension and drivetrain components have been under significant stress. The 2024 test further highlighted severe corrosion in the front struts and coil springs, alongside excessively worn suspension arm ball joints, which collectively point to a vehicle that has either been subjected to heavy or prolonged use or has not received adequate maintenance. These recurring defects suggest that the vehicle may have been neglected in critical areas, particularly where corrosion and mechanical wear are concerned, and that further inspection is essential before proceeding with purchase. The recorded mileage of 60,452 miles for a vehicle aged approximately 16 years represents an unusually low annual usage rate of around 3,778 miles per year, which is far below the typical expectations for a car of this age and model. Such low mileage can result from prolonged periods of inactivity, particularly if the vehicle has been stored in conditions that accelerate corrosion or fluid degradation. However, it is also possible that the vehicle has been driven sparingly, which could mask wear and tear that would otherwise be more apparent at higher mileages. The suspension and drivetrain components, which have shown significant wear and corrosion in multiple MOT tests, may have been exposed to less dynamic stress due to lighter use, but this does not absolve the need for thorough inspection. The brake system, in particular, could be affected by prolonged standing, leading to potential issues such as brake disc corrosion or binding calipers, which would require immediate attention to ensure roadworthiness. Given the vehicle’s MOT history and the recurring advisories, the prospective buyer should conduct a meticulous physical inspection to address the known and suspected issues. First and foremost, the suspension system must be scrutinised for signs of further wear or failure, particularly the front struts, coil springs, and anti-roll bar linkages. Listen for unusual clunking or rattling noises when driving over bumps, as these could indicate failing suspension bushes or loose components. The wheel bearings should be checked for excessive play or grinding sounds when rotating the wheels manually, which aligns with the 2025 MOT failure. The brake system should also be inspected for any signs of corrosion on discs or calipers, as well as for uneven wear patterns that may suggest misalignment or binding. The rear axle and its associated components, noted for corrosion in prior tests, should be examined for rust or structural integrity, especially around the housing and mounting points. For the tyre condition, the buyer should verify the advisories from the 2025 and 2026 MOTs, focusing on the near-side rear tyre for signs of cracking or perishing, which can compromise road grip and safety. The offside front inner tyre, which was worn close to the legal limit in previous tests, should be measured precisely to ensure it does not exceed the legal minimum tread depth. Additionally, the tyre’s sidewall should be checked for any signs of ageing, such as cracking or dry rot, which can weaken the tyre structure and lead to sudden failure. The vehicle’s battery should be tested for health, as low mileage can sometimes mask issues that become apparent only when the car is in use. Finally, the fluid levels and condition—particularly the brake fluid, coolant, and transmission fluid—should be assessed, with a note that fluids degrade over time, even when not in use, and may require replacement based on the vehicle’s age and storage conditions. If the buyer suspects prolonged inactivity, a thorough service check should be prioritised, including a review of the service book for any scheduled maintenance that may have been missed.