2011 Alfa Romeo Giulietta 2.0L Diesel · WN11 YOD

The vehicle remains roadworthy as of its most recent MOT on 2025-04-01, though the identical failure notice issued on the same day suggests the same defects were not rectified between tests. The maintenance trend is neither improving nor stabilising — it is effectively stagnant, with recurring issues like tyre wear, suspension bush wear, and brake pad thinness persisting across multiple tests. The fact that the same tyres were flagged for cuts and perishing in both 2025 tests, alongside the unchanged suspension bush condition from 2024, indicates a lack of proactive repair. The windscreen damage, while not critical, also remains unresolved, suggesting a pattern of deferred maintenance rather than active care. Mileage progression from 89,214 miles in March 2023 to 108,680 miles in April 2025 reflects a consistent annual average of roughly 9,700 miles — slightly above the 7,245-mile average for its age, which implies moderate to heavy usage. The gap between the 2023 and 2024 tests is 11,166 miles over 13 months, and the 2024 to 2025 interval is 8,300 miles over 12 months, indicating no sudden spikes or long periods of inactivity. The data is relatively clean in terms of mileage tracking, with no gaps or anomalies that would suggest tampering or inconsistent recording. The vehicle’s age and mileage are broadly in line with market expectations for a 2011 model, though the higher-than-average annual mileage may accelerate wear on components like brakes, suspension, and tyres. Buyers should inspect the front and rear brake systems closely, as brake pad thickness has been flagged as thin in every test since 2023, with front discs showing pitting and scoring in 2024. The suspension bushes, particularly the front lower arms, have been noted as worn since 2024 and remain unaddressed, which could affect handling and ride comfort. Tyre condition is a major concern — multiple cuts and perishing on both rear tyres, plus mismatched front tyres in 2025, indicate a failure to maintain consistent, safe tread and profile. The nearside rear suspension mounting area shows corrosion, which, while not excessive, may indicate a longer-term structural risk if left unattended. The windscreen damage, though not critical, should be checked for any potential impact on visibility or structural integrity. The vehicle’s mechanical condition is not catastrophic, but it is clearly neglected in key areas. The repeated failure to address brake wear, tyre condition, and suspension bush wear suggests the previous owner prioritised minimal compliance over safety or longevity. A buyer should budget for immediate brake and tyre replacement, and consider a full suspension inspection to assess bush wear, coil springs, and control arm integrity. The corrosion on the suspension mounting area warrants a visual and tactile check for any deep pitting or structural compromise. While the car is currently roadworthy, its maintenance history paints a picture of deferred care — not a vehicle that has been well looked after.