Official DVLA Record
MOT Valid
Check Service Records

2018 Vauxhall Corsa 1.4L Petrol · WN68 KJF

WN68 KJF

2018 Vauxhall Corsa (1.4L, petrol). First registered 24/10/2018. Recorded mileage 38,473 miles. MOT valid until 15/02/2027.

Make & Model
VAUXHALL CORSA
Year / Origin
2018 · Bristol
MOT Status
Valid until 15/02/2027
Road Tax
Recorded Mileage
38,473 mi
ULEZ Compliance
ULEZ Compliant (Euro 4+)
Fuel & Engine
Petrol · 1.4L
Reliability Guide
Common Faults
MOT Status
Valid
Valid until 15/02/2027
Tax Status
Checking...
Checking DVLA database...
Fuel Type
Petrol
Year
2018
Engine
1398cc
Mechanical Assessment

AI-generated interpretation of this vehicle’s MOT record — not an official statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

We need to produce 3-4 concise plain-text paragraphs, under 450 words, no markdown, no bullet points, no headings. Must start first paragraph directly with overall roadworthiness status and whether maintenance trend is stable, worsening, or improving, referencing most recent test. Use formal expert tone, active voice, precise terms. Must reference specific dates, mileages, outcomes. Must evaluate mileage pattern relative to age. Must summarize what buyer should inspect in person based on recurring faults or structural/mechanical components flagged. Must not use generic transition words like "Additionally", "Furthermore", etc. Must not start sentences with those. Must vary sentence lengths. Must avoid safety platitudes and marketing hype. We have MOT history: 2026-02-16 PASSED at 38,473 miles, no defects recorded. Also 2024-12-30 PASSED at 28,991 miles, no defects recorded. Also 2024-12-30 FAILED at 28,991 miles, no defects recorded. Wait contradictory: same date same mileage both PASSED and FAILED? Possibly one is a retest? But record shows both. Could be that first is initial test, second is retest after failure? Actually they list both. Might be a mistake but we must use data as given. We can interpret that the FAILED entry is perhaps a previous test? We can interpret that the FAILED entry is a failure that had no defects recorded? That can't be. Maybe they meant that the FAILED entry had no defects recorded? That would be a pass. But they label it FAILED. Could be a typographical error; but we must use the data as given. We can say that the most recent test (2026-02-16) passed with no defects, indicating stable condition. The earlier FAILED entry at 28,991 miles on 2024-12-30 had no defects recorded, which suggests that any issues were minor or resolved at retest. Or we can say that the failure was recorded but no defects were noted, indicating perhaps a administrative error, but we can treat it as a pass. Better to focus on the most recent test: passed with no defects. The trend: previous tests also passed with no defects. So overall trend is stable, no worsening. The mileage pattern: low mileage per year, gaps? Let's examine dates: 2022-09-16 at 20,063 miles, passed. 2023-09-23 at 24,523 miles, passed. 2024-12-30 at 28,991 miles, passed then failed (same day). Then 2026-02-16 at 38,473 miles, passed. So mileage increased roughly 4,500 miles per year. Gaps: about 1 year between 2022 and 2023 test, then about 3 months to 2024 test, then about 14 months to 2026 test. We need to assess mileage pattern relative to age: 8 years old, 38,473 miles, about 4,800 miles per year, low. Could reflect light use or standing. No major spikes. Now third/fourth paragraph: summarize what buyer should inspect: suspension bushes, coil springs, brake discs, calipers, structural rust, etc. Since no defects recorded, but low mileage may hide wear; need to check for binding brakes, worn suspension components, corrosion, exhaust, etc. We must avoid generic transition words. Must not start sentences with "Additionally", "Furthermore", "Moreover", "Consequently", "In conclusion". Must use natural phrasing. We need 3-4 paragraphs. Let's aim for 3 paragraphs? The instruction says 3 to 4 paragraphs. We can do 3 paragraphs. But we need to include all required content. Could do 4 paragraphs: first overall status, second mileage pattern, third/ fourth summarizing inspection points. But we need to keep under 450 words. Let's aim for 3 paragraphs of moderate length. We must vary sentence lengths, mix short and longer. Must use active voice, precise terms. Must not use markdown. Must not use bullet points. Must not use headings. Must not use generic transition words at start of sentences. Must not use "Additionally". Must not use "Furthermore". Must not use "Moreover". Must not use "Consequently".

WN68 KJF Key Findings

  • 5 MOT tests recorded
  • Latest MOT passed on 16/02/2026
  • 38,473 miles recorded at latest MOT
  • 1 historical MOT failure
  • No defects recorded at the latest MOT

Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.

Updating live data
MOT Roadworthiness Analysis
83
/ 100 · Good
DVSA Test Records Evaluated

MOT Roadworthiness: Good

This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.

✓ Valid MOT
! Tax Status Unknown
✓ Good MOT pass rate (80%)
Experian Provenance Check

Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.

Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for WN68KJF

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Finance
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Write-off
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Salvage
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Imported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Exported
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Scrapped
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
Destruction
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
V5C Logbook
EXPERIAN
Available in full check
£20,000 Experian Data Guarantee Included

Verify Outstanding Finance & Provenance Before Buying

Free DVLA records only confirm roadworthiness. Protect yourself against active finance repossession, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage fraud with an official Experian check.

✓ One-off payment (no subscription)✓ Instant on screen + PDF emailed✓ Official Experian registry✓ Apple Pay / Google Pay / Cards

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

ULEZ Compliant

Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence

Estimate current market value

Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.

WN68 KJF Mileage History

  1. 16/09/202220,063 mi
  2. 23/09/202324,523 mi+4,460 mi
  3. 30/12/202428,991 mi+4,468 mi
  4. 30/12/202428,991 mi
  5. 16/02/202638,473 mi+9,482 mi

Average of roughly 5,384 miles per year across 5 recorded odometer readings.

WN68 KJF MOT History

Live data last synced with DVSA: 16 May 2026, 02:04
MOT Analysis

Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.

5 MOT tests are recorded for this 2018 Vauxhall Corsa (WN68 KJF) between September 2022 and February 2026.

The record contains 4 passes and 1 failure.

The most recent test on 16 February 2026 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 1 failure that buyers may want to investigate.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY