2011 Nissan Juke 1.5L Diesel · YA11 AAX

The 2011 Nissan Juke’s most recent MOT test on 2025-05-20 passed without defects, but the record reveals a concerning pattern of repeated failures just two days prior and again in May 2024. The vehicle’s ability to pass only after multiple retests suggests either a rushed or inconsistent maintenance approach, particularly given that no defects were ever formally recorded—an anomaly that warrants scrutiny. The latest passing test is just over two years old, placing it at the upper limit of the MOT’s three-year validity window. While no structural or safety-critical failures have been officially documented, the repeated failures imply either a lack of pre-test preparation or underlying issues that were not fully addressed between tests. The recorded mileage of 127,097 miles over 15 years equates to an average of approximately 8,473 miles annually, which is typical for a vehicle of this age. However, the abrupt accumulation of 13,669 miles between the 2024-05-07 failure and the 2025-05-20 pass—spanning just over a year—suggests either intensive use or a period of deferred maintenance. The absence of any mileage gaps larger than this indicates consistent driving rather than prolonged neglect, though the rapid mileage spike raises questions about whether critical components like suspension bushes, coil springs, or brake calipers were allowed to degrade beyond serviceable limits. Given the repeated failures without documented defects, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the suspension system, particularly the rear subframe and bushes, as these are common failure points in Juke models. The binding calipers or uneven brake wear noted in past retests (implied by the repeated failures) should be verified, along with the structural integrity of the chassis for corrosion, especially around wheel arches and sills. The exhaust system and emissions controls should also be checked, as these are frequent causes of MOT failures in this age range. While the MOT history does not indicate catastrophic failure risks, the pattern of near-misses suggests a vehicle that may have been driven with minimal preventive maintenance.