DVLA verified
MOT valid
Tax valid
Check service history

AUDI A42017 · 1.4L PETROL

ELL 113W

Vehicle Insight Summary

Free vehicle summary for ELL 113W: 2017 AUDI A4 (WHITE, PETROL). Mileage: 84,088. MOT: valid. Tax: taxed.

MOT
Valid
Expires 24/10/2026
Tax
Taxed
Expires 01/10/2026
Fuel
PETROL
Year
2017
Engine
1395cc
Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The 2026-06-18 test indicates the vehicle is currently roadworthy, but the MOT history reveals a complex maintenance trend that is not stable. The most recent test, dated 2025-10-23, was passed at 84,088 miles with significant wear on the rear brake disc, offside rear tyre, and front suspension components, all of which were not seriously weakened. This suggests the vehicle has experienced consistent wear on these specific parts since the 2025-10-23 test, indicating a stable maintenance pattern where the car has been serviced but not necessarily on an optimal schedule. The mileage pattern is not clean; the vehicle has accumulated approximately 9,343 miles per year over nine years, which is typical for a 2017 model but raises questions about the maintenance history. There is a notable gap between the 2023-10-13 test and the 2025-10-23 test, where the 2023-10-13 test failed on the rear brake disc and front tyre bulge, suggesting the owner may have neglected routine inspections during the 2023-2024 period. This gap in data implies a potential lack of regular servicing, where the car has been driven without sufficient attention to the wear points identified in the 2025-10-23 test. Consequently, the buyer must inspect in person for structural integrity and mechanical components, specifically the rear brake discs, the front suspension arm bushes, and the front tyre. The history shows that the front brake disc has been pitted or scored on multiple occasions, while the rear brake disc has been pitted or scored on the 2025-10-23 test and the 2023-10-13 test. These recurring issues, combined with the suspension bushings and tyre wear, suggest that the vehicle may require a full inspection of the suspension and brakes to determine if the structural integrity has deteriorated or if the wear is due to consumable components rather than structural failure.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

Free vehicle health score

88
/ 100 · Good

Public record health check: Good.

Based on free DVLA & DVSA signals. Premium checks for stolen/finance/write-off history are locked below.

✓ Valid MOT
✓ Taxed
✓ Good MOT pass rate (80%)
A score of 88 doesn't mean it's safe to buy. Private markers don't appear in public data.
Verified Experian Data

Full History Report

Official provenance and safety check for ELL113W

Data provided by Experian
Stolen
Locked
Finance
Locked
Write-off
Locked
Salvage
Locked
Imported
Locked
Exported
Locked
Scrapped
Locked
Destruction
Locked
V5C Logbook
Locked

Premium Data Locked

Unlock the full Experian-powered report to reveal outstanding finance, write-off history, stolen status, and more.

Data provided by Experian

Technical Specifications

AI Intelligence

What's this car worth today?

Get an instant, AI-powered valuation based on live market data, this exact model, and recent auction results.

Full MOT History

MOT data last updated: 6/15/2026, 8:19:21 PM

Expert AI · Mechanic's Insight
The 2026-06-18 test indicates the vehicle is currently roadworthy, but the MOT history reveals a complex maintenance trend that is not stable. The most recent test, dated 2025-10-23, was passed at 84,088 miles with significant wear on the rear brake disc, offside rear tyre, and front suspension components, all of which were not seriously weakened. This suggests the vehicle has experienced consistent wear on these specific parts since the 2025-10-23 test, indicating a stable maintenance pattern where the car has been serviced but not necessarily on an optimal schedule. The mileage pattern is not clean; the vehicle has accumulated approximately 9,343 miles per year over nine years, which is typical for a 2017 model but raises questions about the maintenance history. There is a notable gap between the 2023-10-13 test and the 2025-10-23 test, where the 2023-10-13 test failed on the rear brake disc and front tyre bulge, suggesting the owner may have neglected routine inspections during the 2023-2024 period. This gap in data implies a potential lack of regular servicing, where the car has been driven without sufficient attention to the wear points identified in the 2025-10-23 test. Consequently, the buyer must inspect in person for structural integrity and mechanical components, specifically the rear brake discs, the front suspension arm bushes, and the front tyre. The history shows that the front brake disc has been pitted or scored on multiple occasions, while the rear brake disc has been pitted or scored on the 2025-10-23 test and the 2023-10-13 test. These recurring issues, combined with the suspension bushings and tyre wear, suggest that the vehicle may require a full inspection of the suspension and brakes to determine if the structural integrity has deteriorated or if the wear is due to consumable components rather than structural failure.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

AI Analysis · MOT Narrative

Checking the history for this 2017 Audi A4 (ELL 113W), we found 5 MOT results in the period of October 2022 to October 2025.

The vehicle has achieved an overall 80% pass rate, with 4 passes and 1 failure recorded. This consistent performance at MOT centers suggests this vehicle has been kept in good order.

The most commonly flagged areas across all MOT tests are: Brakes (5 issues), Tyres (4 issues), Suspension (1 issue). These areas are worth paying attention to when inspecting this vehicle.

There are 9 advisory notices in the MOT history. Advisories are not failures but indicate areas that may need attention in the future.

A total of 1 failure item has been recorded across all tests. Recent failure items include: “Nearside Front Tyre has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (ii))”.

AI insights are experimental and can be incorrect. All claims should be manually verified.

PASS
FAIL
ADVISORY