2010 Mazda 5 2.0L Petrol · YY10 AEF

The most recent MOT test on 2026-03-21 confirms this Mazda 5 remains roadworthy, with no defects recorded at 65,728 miles. The test history over the past three years shows a consistent pattern of annual passes, though the December 2024 entry is anomalous—it lists both a pass and a failure on the same date at identical mileage, which suggests either a duplicate entry or a rare administrative error. No recurring faults appear in the official record, indicating the vehicle has not been flagged for serious issues like suspension failure, binding brakes, or structural corrosion during these tests. However, the lack of advisories or minor faults in any of these entries means potential wear—such as worn suspension bushes or coil springs—has not been formally noted by the tester, leaving those areas as critical areas for independent verification. The mileage progression of approximately 4,100 miles per year is unusually low for a vehicle of this age, particularly given its 2010 model year. Between the 2022 and 2023 tests, the car accumulated just 1,208 miles, and another 1,509 miles passed between 2023 and 2024. Such minimal usage could imply prolonged periods of storage, which may have contributed to issues like battery degradation, tyre dry-rotting, or fluid contamination if maintenance was neglected during inactivity. Conversely, it could reflect careful owner usage, but the absence of any advisories in the MOTs means even minor concerns—like worn brake pads or failing wiper blades—have not been formally highlighted. Given the clean MOT history, a buyer should prioritise an inspection of suspension components, particularly the rear suspension bushes and coil springs, as these are common wear items that often fail without prior warning. The brakes, though not failed, should be checked for uneven pad thickness or binding calipers, especially if the vehicle has spent extended periods stationary. Tyre condition is another critical area; failing twice on tread depth in prior records (if any existed outside this dataset) would suggest basic upkeep was inconsistent, so verifying current tread depth and lateral wear is essential. Finally, a thorough examination of the underbody for corrosion—particularly around the sills, subframe, and exhaust mounting points—is warranted, as rust can compromise structural integrity without immediate MOT failure. The lack of advisories does not guarantee these areas are sound, only that they were not severe enough to fail inspection at the time of testing.