2002 Ford Focus 1.6L Petrol · CK52 OBO

Significant corrosion, especially to the near‑side rear body and sub‑frame, dominates the MOT record of this 2002 Ford Focus, with a serious failure for excessive chassis corrosion recorded in 2015 and recurring corrosion advisories on the rear sub‑frame, front suspension arms and coil spring noted in later years. The latest test in January 2020 passed but retained multiple advisories for worn suspension arm pins/bushes and sub‑frame rust, indicating that while the vehicle remains legally roadworthy, the underlying structural decay has not been rectified and may be progressing. At 105,206 mi spread over 24 years the average annual mileage is roughly 4,400 mi, well below typical usage for a car of this age. Such low utilisation often points to periods of limited running or prolonged storage, conditions that can accelerate moisture‑induced rust on chassis members and suspension mounting points. The MOT history shows no large mileage jumps between tests, suggesting the vehicle has not experienced sudden high‑stress mileage spikes, but the combination of low use and documented corrosion warrants close scrutiny of structural integrity. When inspecting, concentrate on the near‑side rear sill and surrounding chassis for signs of rust perforation, flaking or softened metal that could compromise mounting points; any audible creaking, flex or steering pull under load may indicate weakened sub‑frame or corroded suspension arms. The front suspension arm pins and bushes were flagged as worn in 2020, so feel for excessive play when turning the wheel at low speed, listen for clunking over bumps, and verify that the coil springs are free of rust and retain their original shape. Brake pads were noted as thin in 2019, so check pad thickness, disc condition and any pulsation in the brake pedal, while the tyre advisories for edge wear mean the current tyres should be examined for uneven tread loss and sidewall damage. Finally, confirm that the near‑side headlamp and rear stop lamp operate correctly, as they were the cause of earlier failures, and inspect the engine bay for any persistent oil seepage that was previously reported as a slight leak. A thorough visual and tactile examination of the under‑carriage for fresh oil stains, as well as a test‑drive that includes gentle acceleration, braking and cornering, will reveal whether the corrosion and wear noted in the MOT records have translated into functional deficiencies that could affect safety or future repair costs.