2015 Hyundai I10 1.0L Petrol · CK65 YRC

The most recent MOT test for the 2015 Hyundai I10 was completed on 2025-11-27 and resulted in a PASS, indicating that the vehicle met all safety and mechanical standards at that time. However, the history reveals a pattern of issues that warrant careful attention. The vehicle has shown mixed performance over the years, with several advisories and failed tests highlighting specific mechanical concerns. These include a front tyre with exposed plies or cords, rear brake discs showing wear, and a rear inner brake disc that was noted as worn but not excessively so. Such recurring defects suggest potential issues with durability and consistent maintenance, which could impact long-term reliability. Looking at the mileage, the car was recorded at 63,945 miles, which translates to approximately 5,813 miles per year. Given its age of around 11 years, this rate is relatively low, indicating the vehicle may have experienced fewer wear cycles compared to newer models. However, the consistent presence of advisories over multiple years points to a gradual accumulation of problems rather than isolated incidents. This trend could imply that the car has been used intermittently or stood for extended periods, which may affect components like the suspension, brakes, and electrical systems. For a prospective buyer, it is essential to conduct thorough inspections beyond the MOT. Check the tyres for cracking or perishing, as the sidewall condition is critical for safety. Examine the battery health, especially since the 2022 MOT noted a nearside rear disc wearing. Inspect the brake discs for corrosion or binding, and verify that the calipers are functioning smoothly. Also, review the service book stamps to confirm regular maintenance intervals. If the vehicle has a clean record or shows very low mileage relative to its age, focus on age-related checks such as corrosion on the exhaust system, fluid degradation, and the integrity of structural parts. Overall, while the latest MOT was satisfactory, the historical data suggests a need for vigilant monitoring of wear indicators and adherence to service recommendations.