2015 Peugeot 108 1.0L Petrol · CP15 ACF

The most recent MOT history for this 2015 Peugeot 108 demonstrates a stable but unusual pattern, with the vehicle passing all tests since May 2022 without any recorded defects. The May 2025 test stands out as anomalous, with two identical entries—one marked as passed and the other as failed—both at the same mileage (67,619) and date (2025-05-27). This duplication suggests either a data error or administrative oversight, though no technical faults were logged. The preceding tests in May 2024, May 2023, and May 2022 all cleared without advisories, indicating consistent compliance with MOT standards during those periods. The absence of recurring advisories or defects implies that major systems—brakes, suspension, exhaust, and structural integrity—have not been flagged for deterioration over this interval. The recorded mileage progression of approximately 6,147 miles per year aligns with typical usage for a vehicle of this age, though the data lacks granularity between tests. The gap between the May 2022 (49,476 miles) and May 2023 (55,656 miles) tests reflects around 6,180 miles in a year, while the subsequent intervals show similar increments without abrupt spikes or prolonged inactivity. There is no evidence of excessive wear from high mileage or neglect from low usage, though the lack of intermediate service records means potential hidden issues cannot be ruled out. The most recent test, just over a year ago, means some components—such as brake pads, suspension bushes, and tyres—will require re-evaluation, as their service life may now be approaching critical thresholds. Given the clean MOT history, a buyer should prioritise an in-person inspection of high-wear items that fall outside the MOT’s scope. Focus on the condition of rear brake calipers and discs, as binding or uneven wear is not recorded but could develop over time. The suspension—particularly coil springs and bushes—should be checked for corrosion or excessive play, especially given the vehicle’s age. Tyres, though not failed in MOT tests, may require replacement if tread depth has degraded below 3mm or if lateral wear indicates alignment issues. The absence of advisories on structural components does not preclude rust in wheel arches or sills, so these areas should be scrutinised for pitting or flaking. The duplicated MOT entry warrants confirmation of the vehicle’s true service history, as discrepancies may hint at incomplete maintenance records.