2009 Ford Transit 2.4L Diesel · EX09 WDJ

The most recent MOT inspection from February 2025 resulted in a pass, but the vehicle's maintenance profile shows a concerning trend regarding structural integrity. While the vehicle has consistently passed its tests, the latest report introduces multiple advisories concerning corrosion on the inner and outer integral body structures, specifically affecting the sills and steps. This represents a shift from previous mechanical or consumable issues toward more serious structural degradation. Although the inspector noted that structural rigidity is not yet significantly reduced, the presence of corrosion across both nearside and offside sections, both front and rear, suggests that the vehicle's chassis and bodywork are entering a phase of progressive deterioration that will require close monitoring and potential remedial welding in the near future. With a recorded mileage of 110,890 over approximately 17 years, the vehicle has averaged roughly 6,500 miles per year. This is considered low to moderate usage for a Ford Transit, which is typically used for heavy commercial work. This usage pattern suggests the vehicle has not been subjected to extreme high-mileage wear on the drivetrain or engine components, but it also increases the risk of age-related issues such as rubber perishing and fluid degradation. The relatively low annual mileage combined with the reported corrosion issues may indicate that the vehicle has spent significant time parked or used for short journeys, which can accelerate oxidation in areas where moisture becomes trapped, such as the sills and structural steps mentioned in the recent history. A prospective buyer must pay close attention to the underside of the vehicle during a physical inspection. The advisories regarding integral body structure corrosion mean you should look for bubbling paint, flaking rust, or soft spots along the sills and step areas. During a test drive, listen for any creaking or groaning from the chassis when traversing uneven surfaces, which could indicate that the corrosion is affecting the vehicle's stiffness. Furthermore, the history shows a previous dangerous advisory regarding a rear axle leak and a minor oil leak. You should inspect the rear axle housing and the engine sump for any signs of active weeping or fresh oil residue, as these issues, if left unaddressed, can lead to component failure or increased running costs. The suspension and tyre history also warrant scrutiny. Previous failures and advisories regarding fractured leaf spring bush eyes and worn tyres suggest that the suspension components and consumables have been subject to wear. While the leaf springs were noted as repaired or passed previously, you should check for any uneven tyre wear or clunking noises from the rear suspension, which could signal that the leaf springs or bushes are failing again. Additionally, given the low annual mileage, inspect the tyre sidewalls for signs of perishing or cracking due to age, even if the tread depth appears sufficient. Finally, verify the service history to ensure that despite the low mileage, essential fluids such as brake fluid, coolant, and oil have been changed according to time intervals rather than just mileage to prevent internal component degradation.