2010 Citroen Grand C4 Picasso 1.6L Diesel · FE10 BZJ

The Citroën Grand C4 Picasso presents a stable roadworthiness record in its most recent MOT cycles, with the September 2025 test at 146,969 miles showing no defects—a clean pass following two consecutive failures in January 2025. Those earlier failures were unusual in that they occurred on the same day at nearly identical mileages (141,487 and 141,494), yet neither recorded a single advisory or defect. This suggests a procedural anomaly rather than a mechanical issue, possibly a tester error or administrative oversight. The January 2024 failures (133,769 and 133,775 miles) follow the same pattern, reinforcing that the vehicle has otherwise passed without major concerns. The absence of advisories or recurring faults in the past two years indicates consistent upkeep, though the repeated same-day failures raise a minor red flag about documentation accuracy. Mileage accumulation aligns closely with typical usage for a 16-year-old vehicle, averaging around 9,186 miles annually—a figure that suggests regular but not excessive driving. The gaps between tests are standard, with no prolonged periods of inactivity or rapid mileage spikes that might signal neglect or heavy use. The most recent MOT in September 2025, just eight months prior to this evaluation, confirms the vehicle has been in active use without any sudden changes in condition. Given the lack of defects across multiple tests, there’s no evidence of accelerated wear or deferred maintenance that would warrant immediate concern. For a prospective buyer, the primary focus should be on components not routinely checked during MOTs, such as suspension bushes, coil springs, and brake binding—areas where wear can develop silently. While the MOT history shows no brake-related advisories, the binding calipers or uneven disc wear could still be present and should be inspected. Structural integrity, particularly around wheel arches and lower chassis, should be scrutinised for corrosion, as rust in high-stress areas can compromise safety. The absence of tyre-related advisories in recent tests suggests tread depth has been managed, but a physical check for uneven wear or internal damage is advisable. Given the vehicle’s age, a thorough fluid check—brake, coolant, and power steering—would also be prudent, as these are not part of the MOT but critical to long-term reliability.