2014 Ssangyong Rexton 2.7L Diesel · FX14 BWP

A repeating pattern of rear brake and parking brake concerns dominates the recorded DVSA history of this 2014 SsangYong Rexton, most recently evidenced by the May 2026 pass where advisories were carried over from the previous month's failure. The April 2026 test recorded a major failure for parking brake efficiency below requirements, which was remitted nine days later at the retest alongside the same two persistent advisories covering pitted rear brake discs and a non-excessive oil leak from the central rear differential housing. Going back further, the 2024 record already showed the front discs scored and pitted on both sides, front brake hose ferrules corroding, and a rear brake pipe corroded and coated in grease, while the 2025 test added a slightly frayed nearside rear seat belt, a deteriorated offside front lower suspension arm ball joint dust cover, and a note that parking brake efficiency was only just meeting the standard. Across five recorded tests within roughly two years, the same braking components have been repeatedly flagged, suggesting progressive wear rather than isolated issues, though the overall pattern is one of advisories and a single failure rather than repeated prohibitions. The recorded mileage of 110,828 miles over twelve years equates to an average of around 9,200 miles annually, which is broadly typical for a vehicle of this age. There are no extended gaps in the MOT testing record that would indicate prolonged periods off the road, nor any unusually large mileage jumps between tests that would suggest inconsistent odometer readings. This consistent usage profile, neither low nor excessive, means the mechanical wear items flagged in the advisories are likely to reflect genuine accumulated use rather than component ageing from standing or aggressive high-mileage service. At this annual rate, suspension components, brake consumables and drivetrain seals are operating within their expected service life envelope, though the specific items flagged are now showing their age. A prospective buyer should pay particular attention to the rear braking system, which has been the consistent weak point across the record. On a test drive, listen for any grinding or rubbing noises from the rear wheels that would confirm the pitted disc condition has progressed to a stage where replacement is now required, and feel for any pulling, judder, or uneven effort under heavy braking that could indicate the discs are now significantly worn rather than merely scored. The parking brake should be tested on an incline to confirm it holds the vehicle firmly without creeping, given that it has failed outright once and was noted as only just meeting requirements on a separate occasion, both of which suggest the rear caliper mechanism or cable adjusters may require attention. The central rear differential oil leak, although classed as not excessive, should be inspected from underneath for fresh seepage or staining on the underside of the rear axle casing, and any whining or humming from the rear under load could indicate the leak has progressed. Additional inspection points should focus on the front suspension and brake hydraulic system. The deteriorated offside front lower suspension arm ball joint dust cover noted in 2025 is a precursor to joint failure once grit ingress accelerates wear, so listen for clonks or knocks from the front end over speed humps and uneven surfaces and check for any vertical play at the wheel when rocked. The corroding front brake hose ferrules and the greased rear brake pipe all warrant close visual examination for any active corrosion, swelling under pressure, or brake fluid leaks, as corroded ferrules can compromise sealing and lead to hydraulic failure. Finally, verify the operation of all seat belts including the nearside rear unit flagged for slightly frayed webbing, ensuring smooth retraction and latching without any twisting or catching.