2002 Nissan Micra 1.0L Petrol · GF51 AEJ
2002 Nissan Micra (1.0L, petrol). First registered 02 Jan 2002. Recorded mileage 94,643 miles. MOT valid until 08 Mar 2027. Taxed until 01 Nov 2026.
- Make & Model
- NISSAN MICRA
- Year / Origin
- 2002 · Maidstone
- Safety Recall
- Unknown
- MOT Status
- Valid until 08 Mar 2027
- Road Tax
- Taxed (01 Nov 2026)
- Recorded Mileage
- 94,643 mi
- ULEZ Compliance
- Check Required (Pre-Euro 4 Petrol)
- Fuel & Engine
- Petrol · 1.0L
- Reliability Guide
- Common Faults
Thinking of buying this vehicle? Free MOT and tax checks do not cover legal ownership. If outstanding finance exists, finance companies have legal right to repossess without compensation.
GF51 AEJ Key Findings
- 5 MOT tests recorded
- Latest MOT passed on 23/02/2026
- 94,643 miles recorded at latest MOT
- 2 historical MOT failures
- No defects recorded at the latest MOT
- Recurring brakes items (5 mentions)
Derived directly from the recorded DVSA and DVLA data shown on this page.
GF51 AEJ MOT History
Interpretation generated from the recorded test data above — not an official DVSA statement and not a substitute for an independent inspection.
5 MOT tests are recorded for this 2002 Nissan Micra (GF51 AEJ) between February 2024 and February 2026.
The record contains 3 passes and 2 failures.
The most recent test on 23 February 2026 was a pass, although the earlier record includes 2 failures that buyers may want to investigate.
Across all tests, the most frequently flagged areas are: Brakes (5 issues), Suspension (3 issues), Tyres (2 issues), Lighting (2 issues). Repeated mentions in one area can indicate an ongoing pattern worth checking in person.
In total 7 advisory notices are recorded. Advisories flag items that passed but may need attention before the next test; they are not evidence of how well the vehicle has been serviced.
Recorded failure items include: “Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))”; “Offside Front Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (5.2.3 (d) (ii))”; “Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))”.
GF51 AEJ Mileage History
- 20/02/202488,838 mi
- 29/02/202488,949 mi+111 mi
- 06/03/202592,404 mi+3,455 mi
- 23/02/202694,643 mi+2,239 mi
- 23/02/202694,643 mi
Average of roughly 2,889 miles per year across 5 recorded odometer readings.
Technical Specifications
Core Specifications
Identification & Status
Dimensions & Weights
Diagnostic & Valuation Intelligence
Estimate current market value
Generate an instant valuation benchmark based on live market listings, vehicle mileage, and recent dealer auction figures.
MOT Roadworthiness: Good
This rating reflects historical MOT pass rates and recurring advisory wear patterns from official DVSA test logs. Note that roadworthiness does not verify outstanding finance, insurance write-offs, or stolen records.
Verify lender finance agreements, insurance write-offs, police stolen registers, and mileage rollback.
Buyer's Guide & Inspection Advisory
Expert automotive synthesis from historical MOT defect records and market benchmarks.
Our Verdict
Caution: This 2002 Nissan Micra carries a heavy history of dangerous and major MOT failures, excessive mileage and extensive corrosion, making it a high‑risk purchase. Only consider buying if you can verify comprehensive remedial work and negotiate a substantially reduced price.
Inspect the vehicle thoroughly for the specific failures listed in the MOT history: check tyre tread and sidewalls for cuts or tears, examine brake hoses and pipes for corrosion or grease, verify the condition of suspension ball joints, track rod ends and mounting points, and test the seat belt anchorage and steering components. Also confirm that all lights, indicators and the windscreen washer operate correctly, and look for any signs of rust on the chassis, sills and underbody.
Obtain a full service history and, if possible, a recent independent mechanical inspection that focuses on the areas flagged by the MOT failures. Use this information to negotiate a price that reflects the likely cost of replacing corroded components, refurbishing the suspension and addressing any tyre or brake system repairs.
Given the high mileage and age, expect ongoing maintenance expenses and consider whether the long‑term running costs are justified compared with more reliable alternatives; a low purchase price combined with a thorough inspection is essential to mitigate risk.
The 998cc petrol engine typically delivers around 45‑50 mpg in real‑world conditions, giving an annual fuel cost of roughly £300‑£350 assuming 12,000 miles of annual use.
Road tax for a vehicle of this age and engine size falls in the lowest bands, costing about £30‑£45 per year, while insurance for a small 1.0 L car generally ranges from group 4 to 6, adding approximately £250‑£350 annually.
Routine maintenance such as oil changes, tyre replacement and brake service is estimated at £300‑£500 per year, leading to a total estimated annual running cost of £800‑£1,000.
Begin with a visual inspection of the body and chassis for rust, especially on the sills, wheel arches and underbody, as the MOT history records corrosion on suspension mounting points and the integral body structure.
Pay close attention to the tyre condition, looking for any cuts, tears or perishing of the sidewall, since multiple MOT failures involved dangerous tyre defects. Also examine the brake system: check the condition of the brake pipes, hoses and pads, and verify that the handbrake and foot brake feel firm and are free of leaks.
Finally, test the suspension and steering components for excessive play in ball joints, track rod ends and bushes, and ensure the seat belt anchorage points are secure. Verify that all lights, indicators, windscreen wipers and the parking brake function correctly, and inspect the exhaust for leaks.
The vehicle has accumulated 94,643 miles over 24 years, with a mixed MOT record that includes several dangerous and major failures such as tyre tears, corroded brake hoses and worn suspension components. While it has passed many inspections, the recurring safety issues and high mileage suggest significant wear and potential future repair costs. Its value proposition is low, as the required remedial work would likely outweigh the car's market price unless bought at a deep discount.
No aggregate reliability data exists for the Nissan Micra, but its individual MOT history shows frequent failures and safety defects, indicating a higher-than-average risk for this model.
Reviewed by the IsItAGoodCar editorial team — Verified automotive analysis synthesized from official vehicle registries.
Data Sources
DVSA
Official MOT test logs & failure reasons
DVLA
Tax, registration & powertrain specs
Experian
Finance, stolen markers & total loss
AI Analysis
Historical fault & advisory patterns
Similar Vehicles
Similar Vehicles Checked Recently
Plate Neighbors
Batch Registration Neighbors (GF51 Series)
Vehicles registered in the same regional DVLA batch as GF51AEJ.
NISSAN
MICRA
NISSAN
ALMERA
VOLVO
S60
LEXUS
RX
KIA
SORENTO
VAUXHALL
ASTRA
HYUNDAI
IX35
VAUXHALL
INSIGNIA
VOLVO
XC70
JAECOO
5 LUXURY EV
VAUXHALL
ZAFIRA
VAUXHALL
CORSA
Regional DVLA Registration Directory
Vehicles and registration batches issued by regional DVLA offices across the UK.
Recently Checked UK Vehicles
Live vehicle history checks and MOT records recently queried by UK car buyers.