2014 Peugeot 308 1.6L Diesel · GF64 ACX

The 2014 Peugeot 308’s most recent MOT test on 2025-08-27 confirms it passed without defects, though it had failed the prior test just six days earlier at 109,979 miles. This pattern of consecutive failures and passes—observed in both 2024 and 2025—suggests the vehicle was likely driven to the test centre for retesting shortly after failing, rather than undergoing significant mechanical work. The absence of recorded defects across all five tests implies no major recurring issues were formally identified by the tester, but the repeated failures raise suspicion that minor faults may have been overlooked or deferred. The latest pass at 110,046 miles means the vehicle has now been on the road for nearly a year without an MOT check, which is outside the standard 12-month window. This could indicate either a deliberate delay or that the car has been used infrequently since the last test. The recorded mileage of 110,046 miles over 12 years aligns with an average of around 9,200 miles annually, a rate that is typical for a vehicle of this age. There are no significant gaps or spikes in mileage between tests, suggesting consistent use rather than prolonged storage or heavy mileage accumulation. The 2024 tests occurred just two days apart, with only two miles separating the failed and passed tests, which is unusual and may imply the vehicle was driven straight from one test to another. This pattern does not necessarily indicate neglect but does warrant scrutiny of whether the car was genuinely roadworthy between those dates or if it was simply retested quickly after minor faults were addressed. Given the lack of recorded defects, the most critical areas for an in-person inspection should focus on components that frequently fail without obvious MOT flags, such as suspension bushes and coil springs, which can degrade silently. The repeated failures suggest the tester may have missed binding calipers or uneven brake wear, so a thorough brake inspection—including disc thickness, pad condition, and rotor runout—is essential. Additionally, the vehicle’s age and mileage increase the risk of structural corrosion, particularly around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, so a visual check for rust penetration is necessary. The absence of emissions-related failures does not rule out catalytic converter issues, so a scan for fault codes would be prudent. Finally, the tyres—though not mentioned in the record—should be examined for uneven wear, which could indicate alignment or suspension problems.