2013 Hyundai I10 1.2L Petrol · GL62 RVR

The 2013 Hyundai i10 presents a roadworthiness profile characterised by a notable absence of recorded advisories across its recent testing history, though the dual test entries on the same dates warrant explanation. The most recent outcome on 22 October 2025 shows both a pass and a fail recorded on the identical date, which almost certainly indicates a first-test failure that was rectified and re-tested at the same visit, resulting in the recorded pass. This is further corroborated by the matching pattern on 13 November 2024. While the official DVSA record shows no defects listed on any of these entries, the re-test pattern itself suggests minor items, possibly lighting, tyre condition, or visibility-related issues, were addressed between assessments. The overall trajectory is one of stable compliance rather than worsening condition, with no chronic advisories logged to indicate deteriorating suspension, braking, or corrosion concerns. For a vehicle of this age, a clean advisory record speaks to generally sound structural and mechanical condition at the point of test. With 103,073 miles recorded on a 2013 car, the i10 has accumulated roughly 7,929 miles annually, a figure that aligns closely with typical usage for a small city car of this vintage. The mileage progression between tests from November 2023 to October 2025 appears consistent with steady, moderate use rather than extended periods of standing or unusual mileage spikes. There are no significant gaps in testing that would suggest the vehicle was laid up for consecutive years, meaning mechanical components such as the brake system, suspension bushes, and drivetrain have remained in regular working order. Consistent annual mileage for a Hyundai i10 is generally favourable mechanically, as the modest engine output places relatively low stress on the clutch, gearbox, and braking components compared to heavier or more powerful vehicles. For a prospective buyer, the absence of recorded advisories means there is no specific component flagged from official testing that demands urgent investigation, though the clean record should not replace a physical inspection. Given the car's age and mileage, particular attention should be paid to the rear axle and suspension components, as small city cars frequently suffer from worn trailing arm bushes, coil spring fatigue, and corroded brake pipes along the underbody after a decade of service. On a test drive, listen for clonking noises from the rear suspension over speed humps and uneven surfaces, which would indicate perished bushes, and feel for any vagueness or knocking through the steering that could point to worn front strut top mounts or drop links. The brake pedal should feel firm and progressive without excessive travel or sponginess, and the vehicle should pull up straight without steering offset. Additionally, the dual pass and fail entries on the same day suggest there may have been minor compliance issues at the point of first test that were easily resolved, so it is worth confirming with the seller what specific items were addressed and whether any receipts are available. Inspect the underside of the vehicle, particularly the subframe mounting points, exhaust hangers, and brake line junctions, for any surface corrosion, as the absence of advisory items does not eliminate the possibility of borderline conditions that were deemed acceptable at test. Check for oil seepage around the engine and transmission, particularly from the valve cover gasket and sump, which is common on higher-mileage i10s and can lead to misfires if oil contaminates the ignition components. Finally, verify that all exterior lighting, the washers, and the horn function correctly, as these are the items most commonly implicated in same-day fail-to-pass scenarios on vehicles of this age.