2013 Vauxhall Mokka 1.7L Diesel · KY13 AFF

The Vauxhall Mokka’s most recent MOT history reveals a stable but concerning pattern of repeated failures without substantive defects recorded. Both the October 2024 and October 2025 tests show consecutive pass/fail cycles at identical mileages—130,004 and 145,437 miles respectively—suggesting the vehicle cleared minor issues just before each test but was otherwise deemed roadworthy. The absence of any advisories or defects in the three-year span implies no major structural or mechanical deterioration, yet the repeated failures raise questions about whether the car was presented for test after recent repairs or adjustments. This could indicate intermittent but easily rectifiable issues, such as loose components, minor electrical faults, or fluid leaks that were addressed just prior to passing. For a buyer, the lack of recorded faults is technically positive, but the pattern of back-to-back failures at the same mileage points to a history of last-minute compliance rather than consistent upkeep. The Mokka’s mileage accumulation aligns closely with typical usage for its age, averaging around 11,187 miles per year over the past three tests. The gap between the March 2023 test (118,484 miles) and the March 2024 test (130,004 miles) suggests roughly 11,520 miles covered in a year, while the following 15-month stretch to October 2025 saw an additional 15,393 miles—both figures within expected ranges for a privately owned vehicle. There are no red flags in the mileage progression, such as sudden spikes or prolonged inactivity, which might otherwise signal neglect or heavy usage. The consistency in mileage increments also implies the car has been in regular, if not particularly demanding, service. However, the lack of recorded advisories or defects in any test is unusual for a vehicle of this age and mileage, reinforcing the suspicion that minor issues were addressed just before each MOT rather than as part of routine maintenance. Given the clean MOT record but the pattern of repeated failures, a prospective buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of consumable and wear-prone components that often trigger test failures. Check the suspension for worn bushes, damaged coil springs, or uneven tyre wear, as these are common causes of advisory or failure notes that might have been rectified before testing. The braking system should be scrutinised for binding calipers, uneven disc thickness, or fluid leaks, particularly if the vehicle has been driven hard or exposed to frequent stop-start conditions. Exhaust emissions and fuel system integrity should also be verified, as minor leaks or sensor faults can lead to test failures without leaving permanent damage. Structural corrosion, especially around wheel arches, sills, and suspension mounts, should be examined closely, as rust penetration could compromise long-term safety even if not yet critical. Finally, the electrical system—including lights, sensors, and warning indicators—should be tested for intermittent faults, given the history of pass/fail cycles without recorded defects.