2016 Peugeot 3008 1.6L Diesel · LL16 FRD

The 2016 Peugeot 3008 currently holds a valid MOT issued on 22 May 2026 at 51,835 miles, but the maintenance trend has deteriorated sharply in the last year. Between June 2023 and May 2025, the vehicle passed three consecutive tests cleanly with zero defects recorded at 37,245, 41,180, and 43,718 miles. That pattern of consistent passes suggests the car was maintained to a reasonable standard through mid-2025. The picture changed on 21 May 2026, when the car failed at 51,829 miles with five separate defects, including a fractured nearside rear coil spring, incorrectly aimed headlamps on both sides, an inoperative registration plate lamp, a worn nearside front tyre, and thin rear brake pads. The very next day's pass at 51,835 miles confirms these items were rectified within 24 hours, but the sudden cluster of faults after three years of clean passes raises questions about whether routine inspection was neglected during the intervening period. The mileage profile is notably low for a vehicle approaching ten years of age. Covering just 51,835 miles over roughly ten years equates to approximately 5,184 miles per year, well below the UK average. The MOT record shows a clear acceleration in usage from mid-2025 onward, with around 8,117 miles covered in the twelve months between May 2025 and May 2026, compared to roughly 3,935 miles per year in the three years prior. This shift from very light use to more regular driving may partly explain the sudden appearance of defects that typically emerge from sustained operation rather than prolonged standing. The mileage progression is consistent and shows no obvious gaps or anomalies that would suggest odometer tampering. A buyer should prioritise a thorough inspection of the suspension and braking components. The fractured nearside rear coil spring flagged in the May 2026 failure is a significant structural concern. Even though it was replaced for the pass, the failure of one spring under relatively low mileage use warrants close examination of the offside rear spring and the front coil springs for early signs of cracking or corrosion, particularly around the spring seats where stress fractures commonly initiate. The rear brake pads were noted as wearing thin just 24 hours before the pass, meaning fresh pads were fitted. A buyer should verify the condition of the rear brake discs for scoring or lipping and check whether the rear calipers are operating freely, as binding calipers can cause premature pad wear that may recur. The headlamp aim defect on both sides suggests either a collision event, suspension sag affecting ride height, or simply that the aim was never checked during routine servicing. A four-corner ride height measurement and a check for any panel or subframe damage would be prudent. The worn nearside front tyre, flagged on the day of the pass, indicates possible alignment issues or uneven suspension geometry, so a full four-wheel alignment check is advisable before committing to a purchase.