2009 Honda CR-V 2.0L Petrol · LL59 XSY

The Honda CR-V in question presents a clean and stable MOT history over the past three years, with no defects recorded in any of its tests—most recently passing at 104,318 miles in February 2026. The absence of advisories or failures during this period suggests the vehicle has been well-maintained within the MOT framework, adhering to basic legal standards for roadworthiness. The only anomaly is the duplicate test entry in February 2026, where the car was both passed and failed on the same date and mileage, which may indicate a clerical error or a retest after minor non-critical adjustments. Beyond that, the consistent passing record implies no major mechanical or structural issues have emerged during routine inspections, though this does not preclude the need for a thorough pre-purchase examination by an independent mechanic. The mileage accumulation of 6,136 miles per year aligns closely with the average for a 17-year-old vehicle, suggesting the CR-V has seen moderate but steady use without extreme wear patterns. The recorded mileage increments—from 71,412 miles in March 2023 to 104,318 miles in February 2026—show a steady progression, with no sudden spikes or prolonged periods of inactivity that might indicate neglect or infrequent use. The most recent MOT, just five months prior to July 2026, confirms the car has been driven regularly and remains within the expected service intervals for its age. However, the lack of advisories in the history means there’s no historical evidence of recurring issues like suspension wear, brake binding, or corrosion that might have prompted corrective action. Given the absence of defects in the MOT record, a buyer should still prioritise a detailed inspection of high-wear components that aren’t routinely checked during MOTs. Particular attention should be given to the suspension—specifically the condition of coil springs, anti-roll bars, and rubber bushes—since these degrade over time and can affect handling without triggering an MOT failure. The braking system, including caliper condition, brake fluid age, and disc thickness, should be assessed, even though the MOT history shows no issues. Structural integrity, particularly around wheel arches, sills, and underbody panels, should be examined for signs of corrosion or fatigue cracks, as these are not always caught in standard MOT tests. Finally, while the MOT record is clean, a professional should verify fluid levels, tyre condition beyond legal tread depth, and any signs of leaks or unusual wear that could indicate underlying mechanical problems.