2015 Peugeot Partner 1.6L Diesel · LP64 AEE

The 2015 Peugeot Partner’s most recent MOT test on 2026-01-26—just six months ago—shows a concerning pattern of repeated failures despite identical mileage readings (67,019 miles) on both attempts. No defects were recorded, which suggests the vehicle passed administrative checks but failed on-site inspections twice in succession, a rare occurrence that implies either a test centre error or a critical but non-recorded issue (such as a hidden fault requiring specialist equipment). The preceding test cycle in 2025 also ended in a double failure at 66,261 miles, reinforcing that the vehicle has not been through a clean pass since at least January 2024. This inconsistency is unusual for a vehicle of this age and should prompt immediate scrutiny of components that often trigger MOT failures without clear defect codes, such as brake binding, suspension misalignment, or exhaust leaks that aren’t always captured in standard tests. The recorded mileage progression of roughly 6,093 miles annually aligns with typical usage for a vehicle of this age, though the lack of intermediate MOTs or service records between 2024 and 2026 creates uncertainty. The jump from 63,489 miles in January 2024 to 66,261 miles in January 2025 suggests moderate annual use, but the absence of any mileage updates between those dates—despite two failed tests—raises questions about whether the vehicle was driven at all during that period or if mileage was artificially reset. The double failures at identical mileages in consecutive years further imply either deliberate manipulation of the record or a persistent, undocumented mechanical issue that evades standard inspection. Given the repeated failures without recorded defects, a buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the braking system, particularly for binding rear calipers or warped discs, as these often trigger MOT failures without explicit codes. The suspension should be checked for worn or leaking bushes, corroded coil springs, or misaligned components, as these issues frequently cause instability or handling faults that testers may overlook without dynamic testing. Structural integrity, especially around wheel arches and sills, should also be examined for corrosion or damage, as rust can compromise the frame’s load-bearing capacity over time. The exhaust system warrants close inspection for leaks or broken hangers, as these are common fail points that may not always be visible during a cursory MOT. Finally, the battery and electrical connections should be tested, as intermittent faults can sometimes evade detection during a standard test.