2014 Suzuki Swift 1.2L Petrol · LS14 CWJ

The mechanical story for this 2014 Suzuki Swift is largely one of consistent roadworthiness, with the most recent test on 23 May 2026 returning a clean pass and no defects recorded, and a similarly clean pass in May 2025. The only failure recorded in the DVSA history is the same May 2025 test, where the vehicle was presented with a non-functioning nearside front position lamp and a non-functioning nearside stop lamp, both classified as present and dangerous. These are straightforward electrical items, typically attributable to a failed bulb or a loose connector rather than any deeper wiring fault, and were clearly rectified promptly, given that a follow-up pass was issued the same day. The 2024 test, however, did flag a cluster of advisories that warrant closer attention, and this pattern of intermittent minor issues is the most useful indicator of where the car may be heading mechanically. Mileage accumulation appears steady and unremarkable for a vehicle of this age. With 95,142 miles recorded over roughly 12 years, the annual rate sits at around 7,900 miles, which is broadly typical and does not suggest either heavy commercial use or extended periods standing. The gaps between tests are all within the standard MOT cycle, with no prolonged absences from the road that would raise concerns about dormant corrosion, seized brake calipers, or stale fluids. The mileage recorded at successive tests also appears to progress in a logical, continuous fashion, reinforcing that the vehicle has remained in regular use and has not suffered any undocumented lay-up periods that could compromise mechanical condition. The advisories issued in May 2024 form the core of any inspection focus. The nearside rear shock absorber was noted as having light oil misting, which on a 2014 Swift at that mileage is consistent with normal seal wear, but it should be monitored as such seepage tends to worsen over time and will eventually compromise damping. A buyer should press firmly on each rear corner and release, watching for the body to bounce more than once, which would indicate the shock has lost its hydraulic function. Both front tyres were flagged as worn to the legal limit with balding on the inner edge, an alignment-related wear pattern that can suggest either worn suspension components or a tracking issue; the inner shoulder wear should be inspected closely on any replacement tyres to confirm it does not recur rapidly, and the front suspension bushes, wishbone, and strut top mounts should be examined for perished rubber or excess movement. The remaining advisories from 2024 are minor in nature, but still worth a physical check. The offside rear direction indicator was slightly discoloured, indicating some UV degradation of the lens that could allow moisture ingress over time, and a rear child seat prevented full inspection of the nearside rear adult belt, so that belt's full length and retraction should be checked visually for fraying or stiffness. On a test drive, listen for any clonking or knocking from the rear suspension over speed humps, which would corroborate progression of the shock absorber leak, and feel for any vibration through the steering wheel that could point to wheel imbalance or a worn front strut bearing. Pay particular attention to brake pedal feel and any pulling under braking, given the mileage and age, and confirm that the position and stop lamps function reliably, as the previous failure in this area demonstrates the electrical system has at least presented a fault once. Overall, the record presents a fundamentally sound example with isolated, easily addressable concerns rather than any chronic mechanical deterioration.