2017 Nissan Micra 0.9L Petrol · LS17 NGE

The Nissan Micra’s roadworthiness record presents a striking anomaly: the two most recent MOT tests in March 2025—both at identical mileages of 67,392 and 67,393 miles—were passed and failed on the same day, with no defects recorded in either outcome. This suggests either a clerical error or an unusually lenient tester, as no advisories or faults were logged despite the vehicle’s age and mileage. The preceding history from March 2024 shows a similar pattern: three consecutive tests at 60,468 and 60,501 miles, all failing without defects. The absence of any recorded issues—despite the vehicle being nine years old with 67,393 miles—implies either meticulous maintenance or an unusually forgiving testing process. No trend of worsening or resolving problems emerges from the data, but the repeated failures without explanation raise questions about the accuracy of the MOT documentation. The Micra’s mileage accumulation aligns closely with typical usage for its age, averaging around 7,488 miles per year. There are no sudden spikes or prolonged gaps that would indicate heavy use or neglect, though the clustering of tests in March 2024 and 2025—within just five days—suggests the vehicle may have been driven to the test centre repeatedly until it passed. The lack of mileage progression between the 2024 and 2025 tests (60,501 to 67,393 miles over a year) is unusual and may reflect either an error in mileage recording or a period where the vehicle was not in regular use. Given the clean MOT history, there’s no evidence of rapid wear, but the absence of advisories or defects is atypical for a vehicle of this age and mileage. For a buyer, the most prudent approach is to treat the MOT record with caution. The repeated failures without defects are red flags that warrant further scrutiny, particularly of components prone to silent degradation. Inspect the suspension for worn bushes or coil springs, as these often fail before becoming visibly damaged. Check the brake system thoroughly—binding calipers, uneven disc wear, or corrosion on brake lines could explain why no faults were recorded despite potential issues. Structural integrity should also be verified, especially around wheel arches, sills, and the underbody, as rust or corrosion could compromise safety without triggering an MOT advisory. Given the lack of documented maintenance concerns, the vehicle may have been well cared for, but the irregularities in the MOT history demand hands-on verification before purchase.