2016 Toyota RAV4 2.5L Hybrid electric · LS66 DCU

The vehicle achieved a MOT Pass on 4 November 2025, though it is worth noting that a Fail was recorded on the same date for a defective nearside front anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover, with a subsequent retest pass once the repair was completed. This dual outcome suggests the vehicle is fundamentally roadworthy but required prompt rectification of a suspension component before being deemed compliant. Looking at the broader MOT history, the maintenance trend appears broadly stable, with clean passes recorded at every annual test from 2020 through 2024, and only the most recent examination flagging tyre and anti-roll bar concerns. The 2021 test had previously identified parking brake efficiency shortfalls and a brake lever reserve travel issue, but these have not recurred in subsequent tests, indicating those repairs were carried out effectively. The current state suggests the vehicle has been conscientiously maintained, though the recent cluster of tyre advisories indicates that age-related consumable wear is now becoming a consideration. The recorded mileage of 62,926 miles over approximately ten years equates to around 6,293 miles per annum, which is broadly typical for a family SUV of this age and consistent with moderate private or light commercial use. There are no obvious gaps in the MOT history that would suggest extended periods of standing or SORN registration, and the relatively even pattern of annual tests implies continuous road use. This level of mileage is not particularly arduous for a Toyota RAV4, which is engineered for durability, and items such as the engine, gearbox, and four-wheel drive components are unlikely to have suffered excessive wear. However, buyers should remain mindful that even at moderate mileages, calendar age affects rubber, plastic, and fluid integrity independently of distance travelled, and a ten-year-old vehicle will have reached several time-based servicing thresholds regardless of odometer reading. With regard to the recent tyre advisories, the nearside front tyre was noted as worn close to the legal limit with edge wear, while all four tyres exhibited signs of cracking or perishing. Tyre perishing at this age is a well-known phenomenon where the rubber compound degrades through UV exposure and ozone attack, potentially causing sidewall weakness even if the tread depth appears acceptable. During a test drive, listen for any increase in road noise or vibration, and inspect the sidewalls closely for visible crazing or hairline cracks. The nearside front edge wear could indicate a misalignment issue, worn suspension bushings, or incorrect tracking, so it would be prudent to have the geometry checked. Replacement of all four tyres is likely advisable given their age, and budget accordingly when negotiating. The anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover failure is a relatively minor but important defect, as a perished boot allows dirt and moisture ingress, leading to accelerated wear of the joint itself and potential knocking noises from the front suspension over bumps. When test driving, pay attention to any clunks or rattles when traversing uneven surfaces or speed humps, and have the linkage visually inspected for play. Additionally, while no exhaust, brake, or corrosion advisories are present, given the vehicle's age it is sensible to verify the condition of the 12V battery, as units over six years old are prone to failure, and to confirm when the brake fluid, coolant, and automatic transmission fluid were last replaced, since fluid degradation occurs over time rather than mileage. Inspect the underside and wheel arches for any emerging corrosion, particularly around suspension mounting points, and ensure the service book is fully stamped to confirm the timing chain or belt replacement interval has been observed according to schedule.