2012 Ford Grand C-MAX 1.6L Petrol · ML12 AEA

This 2012 Ford Grand C-Max has maintained a consistent MOT pass history across five consecutive tests, with no defects or advisories recorded in the most recent cycle ending on 27 November 2025. The vehicle’s roadworthiness status remains stable, though the final test occurred just six months ago—well within the DVSA’s recommended interval for proactive inspection. No recurring issues suggest a pattern of deferred maintenance, and the absence of advisories implies that even non-critical components like suspension bushes or coil springs have likely been addressed by previous owners. That said, the lack of defects does not preclude wear beyond MOT thresholds, particularly in areas like brake pads, tyres, or corrosion-prone zones. The recorded mileage of 98,761 miles aligns with typical usage for a vehicle of this age, averaging around 7,054 miles annually. There are no irregular gaps or spikes in the MOT schedule, and the progression from 67,948 miles in December 2021 to 98,761 miles today reflects steady, moderate use without prolonged periods of inactivity. While lower mileage might suggest lighter usage, this record does not indicate any extended periods of neglect that could accelerate wear in suspension, drivetrain, or rust-susceptible areas. A buyer should prioritise an independent inspection of the braking system , particularly the rear calipers and discs, as binding brakes were not flagged in any MOT but can develop over time. The suspension —including coil springs, bushes, and dampers—should be examined for uneven wear or fluid leaks, as these components often fail silently beyond MOT tolerances. Corrosion checks are critical, especially around wheel arches, sills, and the subframe, given the vehicle’s age; rust can compromise structural integrity without immediate MOT failure. Finally, the exhaust system and emissions controls warrant scrutiny, as catalytic converter efficiency or leaks may not always trigger an advisory but can impact performance and fuel economy. Tyre tread depth and condition, while not MOT-failed here, should be verified, as failing twice on tread suggests basic upkeep may have been inconsistent.